Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 1, 1993Journal of Applied Physiology

The linear regression between pulse contour and rebreathing CO showed strong correlation (r = 0.96), with a standard deviation of the difference of 0.5 l/min.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Does noninvasive cardiac output measurement by arterial pulse analysis accurately compare with inert gas rebreathing in healthy male volunteers?

Population

6 healthy male volunteers

Comparison

Noninvasive cardiac output measurement by… vs Inert gas rebreathing

Design

Other

Follow-up

27 days

Authors

WSWim J. StokFBF. BaischAHA. Hillebrecht

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Strong agreement in healthy volunteers supports method validation; leaves open accuracy and utility in clinical populations.

Structured PICO

Does noninvasive cardiac output measurement by arterial pulse analysis accurately compare with inert gas rebreathing in healthy male volunteers?

P
Population
6 healthy male volunteers
I
Intervention
Noninvasive cardiac output measurement by arterial pulse analysis using Finapres
C
Comparator
Inert gas rebreathing
O
Outcome
Agreement and correlation between cardiac output measured by pulse contour analysis and inert gas rebreathingsurrogate

Noninvasive cardiac output measurement by arterial pulse analysis using Finapres correlates strongly with inert gas rebreathing in healthy volunteers.

Cite This Study

Stok et al. (1993) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dee41644e8c00149b0bd4ahttps://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1993.74.6.2687
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share