Personalized Vestibular Rehabilitation in Persistent Postural–Perceptual Dizziness (PPPD), Unilateral and Bilateral Vestibular Dysfunction: A Comparative Study

Background: In the last few decades, a growing body of evidence has confirmed that vestibular rehabilitation (VR) can improve the symptoms of many unilateral and bilateral vestibular disorders, by facilitating vestibular compensation mechanisms, such as adaptation, substitution, and habituation. However, the usefulness of the vestibular rehabilitation approach in Persistent Postural–Perceptual Dizziness (PPPD) is currently highly debated and unclear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of VR using computerized dynamic posturography in PPPD patients as a single treatment and without other associated psychological or pharmacological therapies. Results were compared with patients with unilateral and bilateral vestibular disfunction, in order to define the role of our rehabilitation model within a framework of personalized therapy for different disorders. Methods: We evaluated 44 patients (23 F, 21 M; ranged from 28 to 82 years; mean age 63.72) affected by unilateral vestibular vestibulopathy (UVP) (n = 19), bilateral vestibular vestibulopathy (BVP) (n = 10) and PPPD (n = 15). For each patient, a comprehensive clinical bedside vestibular assessment was carefully performed by expert clinicians, as well as Bithermal caloric tests with videonystagmography (VNG), Video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) and Computed Dynamic Posturography (CDP). The impact of dizziness on quality of life (QoL) was assessed by the Italian Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI). All subjects evaluated in this study underwent five rehabilitative therapy sessions in our centre, once a week for 45 min and exercised daily for 30 min at home. All the exercises progressively became more difficult each week. Results: Our study showed that vestibular rehabilitation improved quality of life and reduced the level of self-perceived handicap in patients affected by unilateral and bilateral vestibular dysfunction, with significant improvement in DHI total score and posturographic parameters. In PPPD patients, rehabilitation did not significantly modify posturographic performances and the improvement in total DHI score did not reach statistical significance, although a significant change was observed in the functional sub-score. Conclusions: Vestibular rehabilitation confirmed its effectiveness in unilateral and bilateral peripheral vestibulopathies. In patients with PPPD, rehabilitation performed with computerized dynamic posturography may reduce subjective handicap and improve some aspects of daily functioning, although the small sample size and the absence of a control group do not allow definitive conclusions about its efficacy.