Objectives: This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacist-based interventions on treatment retention and nonprescribed opioid use among individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD). A secondary objective was to characterize the types of pharmacist-based interventions for treating OUD. Methods: PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were searched for records published from the inception of each database until 2025 by 2 independent reviewers. We also searched clinicaltrial.gov and Google Scholar. Eligible studies reported retention in treatment following pharmacist-based interventions for patients with OUD. We performed meta-analyses using the generic inverse variance method and random effects models to estimate the pooled retention rates and the proportion of negative urine opioid toxicology tests following pharmacist-based interventions. Results: Of 3318 records screened and 47 full‑text reviewed, 13 were included. The overall pooled retention rate following pharmacist-based intervention was 77% (pooled proportion=0.77, 95% CI: 0.67–0.87). A pooled retention rate of 76% at 6 months (pooled proportion=0.76, 95% CI: 0.63–0.90) and 59% at 1 year (pooled proportion=0.59, 95% CI: 0.50–0.68) were observed. The pooled proportion of negative urine opioid toxicology test was 84% (pooled proportion=0.84, 95% CI: 0.73–0.96). Pharmacists performed comprehensive functions, including collaborating on OUD diagnostic confirmation, prescribing, and initiating medications for OUD. Conclusions: Pharmacist-based interventions were associated with a pooled retention rate of 77% and reduced nonprescribed opioid use. Our findings underscore the value of pharmacists’ multifaceted roles and support their integration into comprehensive care models addressing OUD.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ruth Jeminiwa
Jam M.M. Yu
Maria Foy
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jeminiwa et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2c1de4eeef8a2a6b1265 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/adm.0000000000001694
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: