Study Design Cadaveric biomechanical analysis. Objectives The specific vertebral region that contributes most critically to pedicle screw fixation remains controversial. This study evaluates screw anchorage under cyclic fatigue loading to determine how bone quality affects the relative contributions of the pedicle and vertebral body to stability. Methods Twelve human lumbar vertebrae (L1–L4) from donors aged 71.3 ± 14.2 years were selected, including six with normal bone density (>120 mg/cm 3 ) and six osteoporotic (<80 mg/cm 3 ). Each vertebra was bilaterally instrumented with the largest self-tapping polyaxial screws fitting the inner cortical diameter. One pedicle received a 35 mm screw, and the contralateral pedicle received the longest screw without cortical breach. Screw side and specimen order were randomized. Sinusoidal cranial-caudal loading at 0.5 Hz was applied, starting at 100 N and increasing by 1 N per cycle, until 5.4 mm screw head displacement (∼20°) was reached. Results In healthy vertebrae, mean fatigue loads were similar for short (315.6 ± 148.7 N ) and long screws (309.0 ± 138.3 N ). In osteoporotic bone, long screws (230.9 ± 55.0 N ) showed significantly greater fatigue resistance than short screws (175.1 ± 45.5 N ; P = .045). Short screws in osteoporotic vertebrae also failed after fewer cycles than long screws in osteoporotic vertebrae ( P = .047) and short screws in healthy bone vertebrae ( P = .049). Conclusions In healthy vertebrae, screw anchorage is mainly pedicular, and extending screw length into the vertebral body adds no benefit. In osteoporotic bone, overall fixation strength declines, but vertebral body contribution increases, so longer screws provide significantly greater stability, whereas shorter screws remain adequate in healthy bone.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Friederike Eva Roch
Betül Tekin
Katharina Jäckle
Global Spine Journal
University of Göttingen
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Roch et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2c50e4eeef8a2a6b1503 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682261442309
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: