Abstract Brazilian pre-salt carbonates are notoriously heterogeneous and heavily overprinted by multi-phase diagenesis, making reservoir-quality prediction away from well control particularly challenging. The spatially continuous constraints available for subsurface characterization are typically limited to inversion-derived geophysical attributes, most commonly acoustic impedance (IP) and, where pre-stack data quality permits, VP/VS. Using two wells from the Atapu field (Santos Basin) as a well-log–scale proxy for geophysical attributes available away from wells, this study evaluates the incremental information content of different attribute combinations for supervised facies classification. Core, thin-section, and well-log data were integrated into three reservoir-quality–driven classes, and Random Forest models were trained using four feature scenarios: IP-only, IP + VP/VS, IP + deep resistivity (RESD), and full-log suite. Model performance was assessed through blind-well testing, and attribute value was quantified using an information-theoretic framework based on entropy reduction. Adding VP/VS to IP yields only modest information gain: relative to the IP-only baseline, facies entropy reduces moderately, whereas combining IP with deep resistivity produces substantially larger gain, approaching the full-log-suite reference. The incremental value of VP/VS over IP is measurable but limited, less than that provided by attributes directly linked to pore connectivity. Quantifying information gain, rather than classification accuracy alone, provides a robust framework for evaluating geophysical attribute combinations away from well control. The workflow offers a practical template to assess the incremental value of elastic and non-elastic attributes for seismic-driven reservoir-characterization strategies in heterogeneous carbonate settings.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Eliane Petersohn
Tapan Mukerji
The Leading Edge
Stanford University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Petersohn et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2c62e4eeef8a2a6b1769 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/tle-2025-1057