Does repeated versus delayed colour-coded information about subclinical atherosclerosis improve CVD risk scores and clinical risk factors at 6 years?
3532 participants recruited during 2013-2016
Repeated VIPVIZA intervention (colour-coded information about subclinical atherosclerosis based on carotid ultrasonography and facilitated by nurse-led motivational dialogue) at 3-year follow-up
Delayed VIPVIZA intervention (first intervention provided at 3-year follow-up)
Group differences in CVD risk factors, European Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2), and Framingham Risk Score (FRS) at 6-year follow-upsurrogate
Providing delayed visual information about subclinical atherosclerosis to a control group after 3 years resulted in similar beneficial effects on CVD risk factors as the original intervention, eliminating most between-group differences at 6 years.
Abstract Aims The Västerbotten Intervention Programme VIsualiZation of subclinical Atherosclerosis (VIPVIZA) pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) previously reported reduced cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk 3 years after colour-coded information about subclinical atherosclerosis based on carotid ultrasonography and facilitated by nurse-led motivational dialogue. This report evaluated the development of CVD risk and clinical risk factors following the 3-year follow-up, at which point the control group received their first delayed intervention and the intervention group received a repeated VIPVIZA intervention. Methods and results Participants (n = 3532) were recruited during 2013–2016 and randomized into two groups. Routine primary care managed preventive treatments. At the 6-year follow-up, group differences in CVD risk factors, the European Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2), and Framingham Risk Score (FRS) were statistically tested. Trajectories of the outcomes in both groups were graphically assessed. The participation rate after 6 years was 75.4%. No significant differences were found between groups in levels of SCORE2, FRS, clinical risk factors, anthropometrics, smoking, or diabetes—except for systolic blood pressure, which was lower in the original intervention group. Risk scores and systolic blood pressure increased in both groups in parallel, while LDL levels decreased and converged. The higher the baseline risk was, the stronger the decrease of LDL cholesterol. Conclusion When the delayed VIPVIZA intervention was provided to the control group after 3 years, the beneficial effect appeared similar as previously reported for the intervention group. After 6 years, any differences between groups in CVD risk were no longer seen. Cholesterol levels were greatly reduced in both groups. Registration The VIPVIZA trial is registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01849575).
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Margareta Norberg
Patrik Wennberg
Per Wester
European Heart Journal Open
Umeå University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Norberg et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2c9ee4eeef8a2a6b1e02 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeag047