PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 2026Biomolecules0 citationsOpen Access

Structure–Activity Relationships, Molecular Mechanisms, and Ecotoxicological Evaluation Underlying Nucleoside-Mediated Antifouling Activity

View Full Paper
SPSandra PereiraIOIsabel B. OliveiraAPAndreia Palmeira

Key Points

  • The study seeks to evaluate the antifouling capabilities and toxicological effects of two nucleoside analogues.
  • Evaluated antifouling activity of hypoxanthine arabinoside and 2'-deoxyinosine against Navicula sp.
  • Assessed settlement reduction in Mytilus galloprovincialis with EC50 calculations.
  • Conducted proteomic analysis to explore molecular responses to the compounds.
  • Performed molecular docking to understand interaction mechanisms.
  • Both nucleoside analogues inhibited Navicula sp. growth by approximately 60%.
  • Reduced Mytilus galloprovincialis settlement with EC50 values of 5.50 µM and 8.54 µM respectively.
  • Increased acetylcholinesterase and tyrosinase activity at near-EC50 concentrations.
  • No lethal effects noted in non-target species, indicating low toxicity levels.

Abstract

Marine biofouling remains a major challenge for maritime industries, affecting submerged structures and vessels worldwide. The long-standing reliance on biocidal coatings, together with their documented environmental impacts, has led to increasingly restrictive regulations and an urgent demand for environmentally compatible antifouling (AF) solutions. This study evaluates the AF potential and toxicological profile of two nucleoside analogues, hypoxanthine arabinoside (1′) and 2′-deoxyinosine (2′), selected based on the previously reported non-lethal AF activity of the naturally occurring nucleosides adenosine and 2′-deoxyadenosine from cyanobacteria. Both analogues inhibited the growth of Navicula sp. by approximately 60% without inducing mortality and significantly reduced settlement of Mytilus galloprovincialis plantigrades, with EC50 values of 5.50 µM (1′) and 8.54 µM (2′), and no lethality detected (LC50 > 200 µM). At near-EC50 concentrations, both compounds increased acetylcholinesterase and tyrosinase activities, supported by molecular docking results, suggesting involvement of neurotransmission- and byssal formation-related pathways. Proteomic analysis revealed compound-specific molecular responses. No lethal effects were observed in non-target organisms (LC50 > 32 µM for A. amphitrite and LC50 > 50 µM for A. salina), and environmental fate modelling predicted low bioaccumulation and rapid degradation. Overall, substitution of the amino group by a carbonyl group preserved AF efficacy without increasing toxicity, highlighting nucleosides as promising low-toxicity AF agents.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pereira et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07dc72f7e8953b7cbeb58https://doi.org/10.3390/biom16040584
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Bioassay-guided discovery of antifouling nucleosides from the cyanobacterium Leptothoe sp. LEGE 181152: Efficacy, molecular targets, and ecotoxicological assessment2025 · 2 citations
  2. 2Interaction of the von Willebrand Factor (vWF) with Collagen1995 · 160 citations
  3. 3Characterization of the main steps in first shell formation in Mytilus galloprovincialis : possible role of tyrosinase2019 · 36 citations
  4. 4Identification of amino acid residues involved in the binding of Huperzine A to cholinesterases1994 · 51 citations
  5. 5UniProt: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 20232022 · 7,396 citations