PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 2026Avicenna Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infection0 citationsOpen Access

In Silico and In Vitro Analyses of Previously Reported Primer Pairs for the Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Their Comparison With Two Novel Designed Primer Pairs

View Full Paper
FYF. YariPMParviz MohajeriRKRamazan Ali Khavari‐Nejad

Key Points

  • The study investigates the specificity and sensitivity of various primer pairs for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
  • Included studies on MTB detection using PCR and qPCR.
  • Analyzed reported primer pairs using in silico software tools.
  • Focused on studies that met established eligibility criteria.
  • Out of 386 articles, 98 met eligibility for analysis.
  • 86.7% of studies utilized endpoint PCR; 13.3% used qPCR.
  • Analyzed data led to the selection of six effective primers.
  • Approximately 50% targeted IS6110 with clinical sensitivity over 80%.
  • 35% of primers targeting rpoB exhibited similar sensitivity.

Abstract

Background: The accurate and timely diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) is crucial in the effective management and control of this infectious disease. Several molecular tests have been developed and are currently utilized for the diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) in suspected patients. This study aimed to investigate various criteria affecting both the analytical and clinical specificity and sensitivity of primer pairs derived from published literature. The study also compared these established primer pairs with two novel primer pairs using in silico and in vitro methodologies. Methods: All studies related to the detection of MTB using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) were included based on established criteria. Eventually, all reported primer pairs were analyzed using in silico online software tools. Results: Among the 386 primarily retrieved articles, 98 met the eligibility criteria and were included for data extraction and analysis. Of these, 85 studies (86.7%) employed endpoint PCR, while 13 studies (13.3%) utilized q-PCR. All reported primers were thoroughly analyzed, resulting in the selection of six primers. Approximately 50% of the analyzed primer pairs targeted IS6110 and demonstrated a clinical sensitivity exceeding 80%. The rpoB gene revealed that nearly 35% of the primer pairs exhibited a clinical sensitivity greater than 80%. Conclusion: The newly designed primers, based on in silico analysis, represented favorable clinical sensitivity and specificity. Consequently, PCR using these primers may prove to be highly beneficial for the diagnosis and management of TB in low-resource settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yari et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07dc72f7e8953b7cbec87https://doi.org/10.34172/ajcmi.3723
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A new diagnostic kit using real-time polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis2026
  2. 2EVALUATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF AN IN-HOUSE CYP141–IS6110 QPCR SYSTEM FOR TUBERCULOSIS DIAGNOSIS2026
  3. 3Accurate and affordable detection of rifampicin and isoniazid resistance in Tuberculosis sputum specimens by multiplex PCR-multiple probes melting analysis2024 · 5 citations
  4. 4Optimization of Annealing Temperature and Primer Concentration for Detection of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Isoniazid Resistance Real-Time PCR Method2024
  5. 5Comparative evaluation of three commercial real-time PCR kits for direct detection of <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> complex and non-tuberculous mycobacteria from pulmonary and extrapulmonary clinical samples: experiences from a low-income and high-burden setting2026