PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 2026Remote Sensing0 citationsOpen Access

Divergent Sensitivity of Gross Primary Productivity to Compound Drought and Heatwaves Across China’s Three Major Urban Agglomerations

View Full Paper
HMHongjian MaYCYuehua ChenYZYichi Zhang

Key Points

  • The aim is to understand how compound drought and heatwaves affect gross primary productivity across major urban regions in China.
  • Analyzed CDH impacts using ERA5 and satellite GPP data for three urban agglomerations.
  • Focused on representative years: 2007 for BTH, 2022 for YRD and PRD.
  • Measured temperature anomalies and soil moisture deficits.
  • Examined spatial heterogeneity of GPP responses based on climatic regimes.
  • BTH experienced significant GPP deficits, with anomalies reaching -1.13 STD.
  • YRD showed positive GPP anomalies of +0.32 and +1.79 STD.
  • PRD recorded even higher positive anomalies of +1.86 and +1.06 STD.
  • North-south contrast highlights a shift from water-limited to energy-limited conditions based on regional climate.

Abstract

Compound Drought and Heatwave (CDH) events increasingly threaten terrestrial carbon uptake, yet the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) responses in urban agglomerations remains unclear. This study analyzed CDH impacts in China’s three major urban agglomerations, namely the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH), Yangtze River Delta (YRD), and Pearl River Delta (PRD) regions, using ERA5 and satellite GPP data (GOSIF and FluxSat) for representative CDH years (2007 for BTH; 2022 for YRD and PRD). CDH conditions exhibited a coherent hot–dry coupling, with temperature anomalies of 0.46–1.26 K and soil moisture deficits of −0.042 to −0.169 m3 m−3, accompanied by enhanced atmospheric dryness. Pronounced spatial heterogeneity in GPP responses aligned with regional climatic regimes and ecosystem types. The water-limited BTH region exhibited significant GPP deficits, with anomalies of −1.13 Standard Deviations (STD) and −0.96 STD for GPPFluxSat and GPPGOSIF, respectively. Conversely, the energy-limited regions showed positive anomalies: the YRD recorded +0.32 and +1.79 STD, while the PRD reached +1.86 and +1.06 STD for GPPFluxSat and GPPGOSIF, respectively. Mechanistically, the north–south contrast suggests a transition from water-limited vulnerability to energy-limited resilience, with vegetation traits and management (e.g., potential irrigation buffering in croplands and deeper water access in forests) modulating sensitivity to atmospheric dryness. These findings provide quantitative benchmarks for improving regional carbon-cycle assessments and adaptation planning under increasing compound extremes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07e242f7e8953b7cbf1b8https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18081175
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Recent variations in the vulnerability of terrestrial gross primary productivity to compound dry-hot extremes in China2024
  2. 2Spatiotemporal Evolution of Compound Dry–Hot Events and Their Impacts on Vegetation Net Primary Productivity in the Yangtze River Basin2026 · 2 citations
  3. 3Response of gross primary productivity to compound dry and hot events in Inner Mongolia under large-scale circulation patterns2026 · 2 citations
  4. 4Impacts of Compound Hot–Dry Events on Vegetation Productivity over Northern East Asia2024 · 8 citations
  5. 5Compound droughts dominated the reduction of vegetation productivity in China from 1982 to 20182026