PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

An interpretable piecewise model for human mortality: the Christopher–Samba model

CLChristopher LalromawiaSPSamba Siva Rao Pasupuleti

Key Points

  • To propose the Christopher–Samba model for capturing mortality patterns across different ages.
  • Developed a piecewise model with two components: an exponential function for ages up to 5 and a logistic model for ages above 5.
  • Used mortality data from the Human Mortality Database to demonstrate the model's effectiveness.
  • Fitted parameters incorporated age thresholds for annual death probabilities.
  • The C–S model effectively captures mortality variations across different populations.
  • Substantial differences were observed in the ages at which the probability of death reaches 1% and 10%.
  • The simplicity and strong fit of the model contribute valuable insights to mortality literature.

Abstract

Modelling mortality schedules has a long history in demographic research, with many models developed over time. This study proposes a new mortality model—the Christopher–Samba (C–S) model—that captures mortality patterns across the entire age spectrum. The proposed piecewise model integrates two components: The first part is an exponential function describing mortality up to age 5, while the second part focuses on mortality above age 5. The parameters of the second component, a reparametrized version of the classical logistic model, reflect the ages at which the annual probability of death reaches 1% and 10%, representing the benchmark ages for the onset of increased mortality and severe mortality, respectively. These thresholds naturally vary across populations. Mortality data from the Human Mortality Database were used to demonstrate the application of the proposed C–S model. The C–S model fits well across countries with diverse mortality schedules. Fitted parameters reveal substantial variation in the ages at which the annual probability of death reaches 1% and 10%, underscoring population differences in mortality dynamics. In summary, with its simplicity, strong fit, and meaningful parameter interpretations, the proposed C–S model is a valuable addition to mortality modelling literature.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lalromawia et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07e3b2f7e8953b7cbf333https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40550-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Global age-sex-specific fertility, mortality, healthy life expectancy (HALE), and population estimates in 204 countries and territories, 1950–2019: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 20192020 · 2,051 citations
  2. 2A Competing‐Risk Model for Animal Mortality1979 · 383 citations
  3. 3Natural and Political Observations Mentioned in a Following Index, and Made Upon the Bills of Mortality1977 · 397 citations
  4. 4A Statistical Distribution Function of Wide Applicability1951 · 11,518 citations
  5. 5On the Law of Mortality and the Construction of Annuity Tables1860 · 479 citations