PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

The impact of wrist flexion on task performance and compensatory movements in transradial prosthesis users

LML K MillerQBQuinn A. BoserVDVikram Darbhe

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate how wrist flexion/extension impacts task performance and compensatory movements in transradial prosthesis users.
  • Evaluated task performance and compensatory movements using the Gaze and Movement Assessment metric.
  • Participants included five adults with unilateral transradial limb absence.
  • Compared task performance under two conditions: with and without wrist flexion/extension.
  • Enabling wrist flexion/extension reduced some compensatory movements at the trunk and shoulder.
  • Participants showed variability in individual response to wrist movement.
  • Findings suggest potential for more normative movement patterns with powered wrist options.

Abstract

Upper-limb prosthetic technology has advanced in recent years, yet most commercially available prosthetic wrists offer only a single active degree of freedom (DOF), typically rotation, with few providing powered flexion/extension. This limitation often forces users to compensate with proximal joints, leading to unnatural movements and potential overuse injuries. Despite user demand for improved wrist movement, few powered wrist options exist, and current outcome measures rarely quantify compensatory strategies directly. To address this gap, the Gaze and Movement Assessment (GaMA) metric was used to evaluate task performance and compensatory movements in five adults with unilateral transradial limb absence, fitted with a custom 2-DOF powered wrist. Participants completed the GaMA Tasks and functional outcomes under two conditions: with and without wrist flexion/extension. Results showed that, though individual variability was high, enabling wrist flexion/extension was seen to reduce some compensatory trunk and shoulder movements towards normative data. These findings suggest that powered wrist flexion/extension may support more normative movement patterns and highlight the importance of individualized prosthetic training. Future work should focus on targeted rehabilitation strategies to minimize compensatory movements as device complexity increases.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Miller et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07e3b2f7e8953b7cbf3b4https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47669-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Electromyographically controlled prosthetic wrist improves dexterity and reduces compensatory movements without added cognitive load2024
  2. 2Multidimensional evaluation of a two-level-of-compliance quasi-passive prosthetic wrist: functional, biomechanical, cognitive and user-experience outcomes in trans-radial limb loss2026
  3. 3Upper Limb Compensatory Strategies Across Tasks with an Ultrasound-Controlled Prosthesis2025
  4. 4Transradial Amputee Reaching: Compensatory Motion Quantification Versus Unaffected Individuals Including Bracing2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Impact of wrist motion restriction on self-feeding: Compensatory strategies using an orthotic fixation model — A proof of concept study2026