Introduction: Monitoring training load is essential in elite soccer to optimize performance and reduce injury risk. The training-to-match load ratio (TMr) has emerged as a useful metric to contextualize training demands relative to competitive match exposure. The objective of this study was to compare daily and accumulated TMr between starters and non-starters over a professional season, considering microcycle day and playing position. Methods: Twenty players (Tier 3) from a professional team were monitored during a full competitive season (30 microcycles; 144 training sessions; 30 matches). External load variables, namely total distance (TD), high-speed distance (HSD), sprint distance (SPD), high metabolic load distance (HMLD), acceleration (ACC) and deceleration (DCC), were collected using 10 Hz GPS devices (STATSports). Daily and microcycle TMr were calculated relative to each player’s maximal match value registered during a full competitive period. Linear mixed-effects models examined the effects of starting status, microcycle day, and playing position. Results: Linear mixed models revealed significant three-way interactions (status × day × position) for locomotor variables: TD (F = 3.36, p 0.05), nor for any accumulated microcycle TMr metrics (p > 0.05). Conclusions: TMr effectively differentiates preparation strategies between starters and non-starters. Although “top-up conditioning” sessions increase early-week relative loads for non-starters, position-specific variations–particularly in mechanical variables during acquisition sessions–highlight the need for individualized load prescription.
Sierra-Casas et al. (Tue,) studied this question.