PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 2026Cancers0 citationsOpen Access

Sebaceous Carcinoma: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of 213 Cases

View Full Paper
SWSebastian A. WohlfeilJUJochen S. UtikalCBChristiane Bauer‐Auch

Key Points

  • To analyze the demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics of sebaceous carcinoma and their impact on overall survival.
  • Retrospective multicenter study of 213 patients diagnosed with sebaceous carcinoma from 2008 to 2024.
  • Data sourced from the Baden-Württemberg Cancer Registry.
  • Comparison of ocular and extraocular sebaceous carcinoma characteristics and survival analysis.
  • Median age of patients was 79 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 2:1.
  • Median overall survival was 61.4 months; no significant difference between ocular and extraocular SC.
  • Age was identified as the only independent prognostic factor, especially in patients aged 70-79 years and ≥80 years.

Abstract

Background: Sebaceous carcinoma (SC) is a rare malignant cutaneous malignancy. Methods: A multicenter retrospective study of 213 German patients with SC diagnosed between 2008 and 2024 was conducted. Data were extracted from the Baden-Württemberg Cancer Registry. Cases were separated into ocular and extraocular SC. Their demographic, clinical, and treatment-related characteristics were compared and influences on overall survival (OS) analyzed. Results: Most patients were elderly (median age: 79 years), with a male-to-female ratio of 2:1. Extraocular SC was more common in men, while ocular SC was more frequent in women. Most tumors were diagnosed at stage I, and microscopically controlled excision was the primary treatment modality (81.4%). Sentinel lymph node biopsy (2.3%), lymph node dissection (1.9%) and systemic therapy (1.4%) were only documented in a minority of cases. Survival analysis (median follow-up 3.2 years) revealed a median OS of 61.4 months in the entire cohort. No significant survival difference was observed between ocular and extraocular SC (64.8 vs. 53.7 months; p = 0.490), and multivariable analysis confirmed no prognostic impact of tumor localization (HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.85–2.4). Age was the only independent predictor of outcome, with strongly increased risk in patients aged 70–79 years (HR 4.4, 95% CI 1.01–19.2) and ≥80 years (HR 16.1, 95% CI 3.91–66.1). Prior malignancies, including MTS-like tumors and hematological neoplasms, were not independently associated with overall survival. Conclusions: In this multicenter cohort, sebaceous carcinoma showed no survival difference between ocular and extraocular disease, with age emerging as the main independent prognostic factor. Prior malignancies and tumor characteristics, including histologic grade, were not independently associated with outcome. Microscopically controlled excision appears to be an effective treatment option.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wohlfeil et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07e3b2f7e8953b7cbf4b6https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18081245
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper