PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 2026Dentistry Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Post and Core for Telescopic Crown-Retained Dentures—An In Vitro Comparison of Different Materials Using Chewing Simulation

View Full Paper
JVJonas Adrian Helmut VoglerMRMilan RacholdBWBernd Wöstmann

Key Points

  • This investigation aims to compare the performance of different post and core materials for telescopic crown-retained dentures.
  • Used a chewing simulator to test performance of CAD/CAM post and core, customized cast post and core, and prefabricated fibre-reinforced post and core.
  • Evaluated outcomes based on tooth fracture and decementation rates.
  • Conducted trials in a controlled laboratory setting.
  • CAD/CAM post and core showed no instances of tooth fracture or decementation.
  • Customized cast post and core and prefabricated fibre-reinforced post and core recorded failures, including tooth fractures and decementation.
  • CAD/CAM post and core demonstrated significantly better performance than both other types.

Abstract

Objectives: Due to extra-axial forces, post and core (PC) treatment has the worst survival probability in abutment teeth for telescopic crown-retained dentures (TCDs). The reason for this is a mismatch regarding the mechanical properties between PC material and dentin or a poor accuracy of fit of PC, resulting in tooth fracture or decementation. However, the inclusion of severely damaged endodontically treated teeth needing PC is often mandatory in order to achieve a stable situation for TCD. Thus, an advancement of PC treatment for TCD is of high clinical interest. Recently it has become possible to fabricate customized PC with favourable mechanical properties by using CAD/CAM technology. Methods: Thus, the aim of this investigation was to compare the performance of these PC types (CAD/CAM PC) to customized cast PC (CPC) and prefabricated fibre-reinforced PC (PFPC) in a TCD set-up using a chewing simulator. Results: The investigation group with CAD/CAM PC showed neither tooth fracture nor decementation, in contrast to the CPC and PFPC groups, in which both types of failure were recorded. Thus, CAD/CAM PC showed significantly better performance than CPC and PFPC. Conclusions: Within the limitations, CAD/CAM PCs are therefore recommendable for PC treatment with TCD.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vogler et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07e582f7e8953b7cbf54fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/dj14040233
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper