PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 2026European Heart Journal2 citations

Ultrasound-guided vs conventional venous puncture for atrial fibrillation ablation: the ULYSSES trial

View Full Paper
DSDavid SchaackKCK R Julian ChunKNKars Neven

Key Result

Ultrasound-guided venous access significantly reduced vascular access site complications compared to conventional puncture during atrial fibrillation ablation.

Key Points

  • This trial aims to determine if ultrasound-guided venous puncture decreases vascular access site complications compared to conventional methods.
  • Randomized, multicenter, open-label superiority trial
  • Patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation randomized to ultrasound-guided or conventional venous puncture
  • Primary outcome assessed was venous access site complications within 30 days post-procedure.
  • The composite primary outcome occurred in 3 patients (0.6%) in the ultrasound group vs 16 patients (3.3%) in the control group (HR 0.19; 95% CI 0.05-0.63; P = 0.002)
  • Unintended arterial punctures were reduced from 16% in the control to 2% in the ultrasound group (P < 0.0001)
  • Unsuccessful venous access attempts dropped from 8.2% in the control group to 0.2% in the ultrasound group (P < 0.0001)

Structured PICO

Does ultrasound-guided venous access reduce vascular access site complications in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation?

P
Population
Patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation procedures
I
Intervention
Ultrasound-guided venous access (puncture)
C
Comparator
Conventional venous puncture
O
Outcome
Vascular access site complicationssafety

Ultrasound-guided venous access reduces vascular access site complications during atrial fibrillation ablation compared to conventional puncture.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Vascular access site complications are the most common procedure-related adverse event of atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. Whether ultrasound-guided femoral venous puncture reduces these vascular access complications remains uncertain. METHODS: In this investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, superiority trial, patients undergoing atrial fibrillation or left atrial tachycardia catheter ablation were randomized to an ultrasound-guided venous puncture strategy (intervention group) or to a conventional venous puncture group guided by palpation (control group). The composite primary outcome was occurrence of venous access site complications until 30 days after the procedure defined as arteriovenous fistula, false aneurysm or access site bleeding requiring intervention or leading to prolonged hospitalization. Secondary endpoints included procedure duration, puncture duration, procedure related stroke/transient ischemic attack within 30 days, number of unintended arterial punctures and number of failed venous access attempts as well as hospital stay duration. RESULTS: In six centers, 986 patients were randomized. A total of 496 patients were assigned to the ultrasound-guided puncture group and 490 patients to the conventional puncture group. The trial was stopped for efficacy following the first interim analysis after enrollment of half of the planned patients. The composite primary outcome occurred in 3 patients (0.6%) in the intervention group and 16 patients (3.3%) in the control group (risk ratio 0.19; 95% confidence interval 0.05-0.63; P = 0.002). Additionally, ultrasound-guided venous puncture significantly reduced the rate of an unintended arterial puncture (2% vs 16%, P < 0.0001) and the rate of unsuccessful venous access attempts requiring crossover to the other group (0.2% vs 8.2%, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided venous access for atrial fibrillation ablation procedures significantly reduced vascular access site complications.(ULYSSES ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT06403527).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schaack et al. (2026) studied this question. Ultrasound-guided venous access significantly reduced vascular access site complications compared to conventional puncture during atrial fibrillation ablation.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07e582f7e8953b7cbf6a4https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehag291
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper