What is the clinical evidence from this study?

Study design: Other. Population: Early-onset hypertension (n=5193). Intervention: TyG-BMI. Primary outcome: Early-onset hypertension.

What does this research mean for the field?

The analysis of the association between TyG-BMI and early-onset hypertension using NHANES data included the 2007-2018 cycles but excluded the 2011-2012 cycle due to missing triglyceride data. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.INCREMENTAL. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to correct previous analyses on the association between TyG-BMI and early-onset hypertension using NHANES data.

April 17, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Correction: Association between TyG-BMI and early-onset hypertension: evidence from NHANES

WLWushuang LiRiverside Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region CGChenliang GeGuangxi Medical University JZJianyong ZhouRiverside Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region

Resultado clave

This correction notice clarifies that the analysis included 5193 adults under 40 years old from specific NHANES cycles (2007-2010 and 2013-2018), excluding 2011-2012 due to missing triglyceride data.

Puntos clave

The aim is to correct previous analyses on the association between TyG-BMI and early-onset hypertension using NHANES data.
Corrected the analysis to include data from NHANES cycles 2007-2018, excluding 2011-12 due to missing triglyceride data.
Acknowledged the exclusion of the 2011-12 NHANES cycle due to a lack of data.
Confirmed the association between TyG-BMI and early-onset hypertension in the revised analysis.

PICO estructurado

Población

NHANES participants from 2007-2018 cycles (excluding 2011-12)

Intervención

TyG-BMI (Triglyceride-glucose body mass index)

Resultado

early-onset hypertension

This is a correction notice regarding the NHANES cycles included in the original analysis.

Resumen

The original version of this Article contained an error in the reporting of the NHANES cycles included in the analysis, in that the analyses included data from the 2007-2018 cycles, but the 2011-12 cycle was excluded due to the absence of triglyceride data.The Article was revised as follows.

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo