PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 17, 2026PLoS ONE0 citationsOpen Access

Improving residents’ satisfaction with administrative boundary changes: A comparative analysis based on the township-town merger policy

View Full Paper
QWQiong WangHZHao ZhaoJSJie Sun

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to understand factors affecting residents' satisfaction with township-town merger policies.
  • Conducted field surveys in Lukou and Hengxi Subdistricts
  • Constructed a logit model to identify determinants of satisfaction
  • Applied Fairlie decomposition to analyze satisfaction disparities between regions
  • Employment incentives, social security, and cultural development are primary drivers of satisfaction.
  • Satisfaction varies significantly between subdistricts based on collective identity and regional approaches.
  • Residents with stronger collective identity experience higher satisfaction through positive comparisons with their past.

Abstract

Administrative boundary changes driven by policies are pivotal instruments for improving resource allocation efficiency. Studying the factors driving residents’ satisfaction with these policies is crucial for enhancing policy effectiveness. Based on field surveys in Lukou and Hengxi Subdistricts, this paper constructs a logit model to identify key determinants of residents’ satisfaction with the township-town merger policy (TMP) and applies the Fairlie decomposition to quantify the sources of satisfaction disparities between subdistricts. Results indicate that employment incentives, social security, and cultural development are the primary drivers of policy satisfaction and interregional differences, exerting greater influence than individual demographic traits. Mechanistically, the study reveals that the development approaches of different regions are strongly associated with policy satisfaction. Besides, residents in communities with stronger collective identity tend to evaluate policy outcomes through temporal comparisons with their own past, leading to higher satisfaction when improvements in social security and cultural preservation are evident. Conversely, in areas with weakened collective identity, residents form higher expectations through upward social comparisons with more developed neighboring subdistricts. When actual policy outcomes fall short of these expectations, satisfaction declines. These findings offer a micro-perspective on how top-down administrative boundary reforms affect public satisfaction, providing recommendations for policy design, sustainable governance, and regional planning.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e1cf1b5cdc762e9d858168https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0346975
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper