PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 17, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The KODAQS Toolbox – Assessing and Mitigating Data Quality Issues - Part 2: Digital Behavioral Data

SCSina ChenYPYannik PetersFKFabienne Kraemer

Key Points

  • The aim is to identify and address data quality issues in digital behavioral data that affect research outcomes.
  • Reviewed challenges related to missing and deleted posts in digital behavioral data
  • Analyzed inconsistencies in annotation schemes across different datasets
  • Discussed preprocessing decisions like text cleaning and stopword removal
  • Identified that missing or deleted posts can skew data interpretations
  • Found that inconsistent annotation schemes create difficulties in data comparability
  • Highlighted that preprocessing steps can alter the original data significantly

Abstract

In the first blog post of the KODAQS Toolbox series, we discussed how data quality issues can affect survey data. Similar challenges arise in digital behavioral data (DBD), though they often manifest differently. Researchers may encounter missing or deleted posts, inconsistent annotation schemes across datasets, or preprocessing decisions - such as text cleaning, stopword removal, or automated translation - that alter the data. In addition, digital traces may only imperfectly reflect the social constructs of interest. If ignored, these issues can quietly undermine even the most sophisticated analyses.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e1cf7b5cdc762e9d858578https://doi.org/10.34879/gesisblog.2026.118
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper