Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) is the most prescribed treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA), but adherence remains a critical challenge, especially long term. This study aims to predict CPAP adherence at 3, 6, and 12 months based on baseline patient status and usage data from initial 30 days of treatment. A retrospective cohort of 2180 patients was analyzed. Feature selection was performed using the maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR) algorithm with bootstrapping. Three machine learning (ML) models were trained and evaluated: support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and multilayer perceptron (MLP). A core subset of early CPAP usage variables (median nightly use, days of use, and 30-day adherence) emerged as the most relevant features across all timepoints. Each prediction window also revealed exclusive features, suggesting that adherence at different stages may be driven by distinct factors. At 3 months, MLP exhibited the strongest predictive capacity (kappa = 0.823, AUC = 0.910). At 6 months, RF and SVM models yielded the highest results (kappa = 0.727, AUC = 0.863), whereas at 12 months, RF consistently outperformed the other algorithms (kappa = 0.698, AUC = 0.849), underscoring its robustness in forecasting long-term adherence. Our results suggest that ML algorithms can effectively predict CPAP adherence using very short-term usage data. Accordingly, our models are able to provide efficient early identification of patients at risk of non-adherence in order to support personalized interventions, improve outcomes, and reduce the healthcare burden in OSA management.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Máximo Domínguez-Guerrero
Daniel Álvarez
Verónica Barroso-García
BioData Mining
Universidad de Valladolid
Biomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine
Hospital Universitario Río Hortega
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Domínguez-Guerrero et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e1cf985cdc762e9d8587e5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-026-00554-0
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: