Turnout locomotor activity is a potentially informative indicator of health and welfare in older horses, yet objective field data in seniors remain limited. We examined whether a brief turnout recording could detect cross-sectional associations between chronological age and locomotor activity in senior horses in this study setting. In this single-site observational study, 28 senior Selle Français horses (17–35 years) contributed 122 paddock sessions (2 h each), with total distance and mean speed quantified using a Polar Team Pro sensor. Associations with age were assessed using linear mixed-effects models adjusted for temperature and precipitation. Age was decomposed into between-horse and within-horse components to separate cross-sectional from within-horse information. Raw (untransformed) total distance ranged from 148 m to 3994 m (median 1128 m; IQR 638–1779 m; mean 1292 ± 834 m). Log-transformed total distance was negatively associated with age (β = −0.062 per year; 95% CI −0.094 to −0.032; p < 0.001), driven by the between-horse component (β = −0.063; q = 0.003). The within-horse estimate was imprecise and not statistically supported (p = 0.75). Mean speed showed a similar pattern, with a significant between-horse association (β = −0.060; q = 0.003) and an imprecise within-horse estimate (p = 0.87). These findings suggest that brief paddock actimetry may help characterize between-horse heterogeneity and support group-level welfare monitoring. However, the present dataset does not allow robust inference about within-horse ageing trajectories or individual-level biological ageing. Larger multi-site cohorts with denser follow-up and external validation are needed before individual trajectories or clinical interpretation can be established.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Luc Poinsard
Claire Anson
Véronique Billat
Animals
Université d'Évry Val-d'Essonne
Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour
Impulse Dynamics (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Poinsard et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e1cf985cdc762e9d85885a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16081208