Purpose: The aim of the study is to prospectively evaluate patient and clinician reported outcomes of voiding function, pain levels and patient satisfaction of transgender women preoperatively (t0), 6 months (t1), and 12 months (t2) after gender-affirming surgery (GAS) with penile inversion vaginoplasty. Methods: Transgender women undergoing two-stage GAS at our tertiary care center were included (02/2020–01/2023). Voiding function (Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, MLUTS), pain (visual analogue scale) and patients reported outcome measures were assessed. Clini¬cal outcomes and complications were evaluated. A regression analysis was performed to identify possible risk factors for a deterioration in voiding function. Results: Fifty-three patients with an average age of 40.27+14.43 years were included. Complications were mostly minor (Clavien Dindo Classification grade I/II). Meatal stenosis occurred in three patients (6.38%). MLUTS voiding and incontinence complaints were low and did not change up to 12 months postoperatively (voiding symptoms p=0.16, incontinence symptoms p=0.32). The same applies to frequency and nocturia (p=0.54 and p=0.32, respectively). Pain intensity increased between t0 and t1 (p=0.003). Pelvic pain was reported by 71% (t1) and 47 % (t2). Patient satisfaction with the functional and cosmetical result was high and increased between t1 and t2, even though not significantly (p=0.71 and p=0.18). Age, pain intensity, and localization had no significant influence on postoperative voiding function in the regression analysis (all p>0.05). Conclusions: Gender-affirming penile inversion vaginoplasty is a safe procedure regarding complications with high patient satisfaction and no significant changes in postoperative voiding function up to 12 months postoperatively.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Maren J. Wenk
Natalie Rademacher
Bernhard Lıedl
Urologia Internationalis
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wenk et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e1cf985cdc762e9d858883 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000551982