PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 17, 2026Türk anesteziyoloji ve reanimasyon derneği dergisi0 citationsOpen Access

Flow-controlled One-lung Ventilation During Carinal Sleeve Reconstruction: Anaesthetic Management and Technical Feasibility

CBCansu Kılınç BerktaşETEmine Şeyda TeloğluFOF Gumus Ozcan

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the feasibility of flow-controlled one-lung ventilation (FCV-OLV) during carinal sleeve reconstruction.
  • Described anaesthetic management of a single patient undergoing lobectomy with reconstruction.
  • Utilized a Tritube® and Evone® ventilator for flow-controlled ventilation.
  • Maintained uninterrupted ventilation during the surgical procedure.
  • Achieved stable oxygenation and carbon dioxide elimination over 180 minutes of ventilation.
  • Avoided interruptions or apneic periods during surgery.
  • Provider optimal surgical exposure without use of extracorporeal support.

Abstract

Carinal sleeve resection with reconstruction represents one of the most challenging thoracic surgical procedures and requires meticulous anaesthetic management to maintain adequate gas exchange within a shared and surgically interrupted airway while preserving an unobstructed surgical field. Conventional ventilation strategies, including cross-field ventilation and high-frequency jet ventilation, may interfere with surgical exposure or result in unstable ventilation. We describe the anaesthetic management of a 64-year-old male patient in whom flow-controlled ventilation- one-lung ventilation (FCV-OLV) was employed during carinal sleeve lobectomy with reconstruction. Following initial double-lumen tube ventilation, FCV was established using a Tritube® connected to an Evone® ventilator and maintained throughout airway reconstruction. Ventilation was achieved without interruptions, apneic periods, or cross-field ventilation. Oxygenation and carbon dioxide elimination remained stable during 180 minutes of FCV, while the small-lumen tube provided optimal surgical exposure. The patient was extubated uneventfully at the end of surgery and experienced an uncomplicated postoperative course. This case highlights the feasibility of flow-controlled OLV as an anaesthetic strategy during complex airway reconstruction. FCV-OLV enabled uninterrupted ventilation, stable gas exchange, and excellent surgical conditions without the need for extracorporeal support or alternative ventilation techniques.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Berktaş et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e1d0165cdc762e9d859180https://doi.org/10.4274/tjar.2026.262398
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Flow Controlled as Compared to Pressure-Controlled Ventilation for One-Lung Ventilation During Thoracic Surgery2026
  2. 2Flow-Controlled Ventilation in Laparoscopic Surgery: A Case Series2026
  3. 3Robotic-assisted carinal reconstruction using cross-table ventilation2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4The narrow airway: from high-frequency jet ventilation to flow-controlled ventilation2025
  5. 5Navigating One-lung Ventilation after Lobectomy: Anesthetic Challenges in Physiological Lung Exclusion2026