PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 17, 2026Agriculture and Human Values0 citationsOpen Access

Pragmatic progress? Trade-offs and seed choices in Tajikistan

MSMichael SpiesIHIrna Hofman

Key Points

  • The research aims to understand the factors influencing maize and cotton farmers' seed choices in Tajikistan and what these choices reveal about agricultural progress.
  • Conducted extensive fieldwork in lowland Tajikistan
  • Analyzed farmers’ seed decisions in the context of political ecology and transition studies
  • Investigated the impact of state, market, technology, and crop characteristics
  • Farmers prefer high-yielding hybrids for maize but choose low-quality local seeds for cotton
  • Seed choices reflect pragmatic strategies shaped by contextual factors
  • The findings challenge traditional views on local versus improved seed development pathways

Abstract

Seed features prominently in the polarised academic and policy debates about the future of agriculture. In this article, we examine maize and cotton farmers’ seed decisions in Tajikistan, where the Soviet-era ideal of industrial modes of agriculture continues to influence farming practices, but where interventions by international actors, along with new paradigms, increasingly affect seed systems. What factors affect farmers’ seed choices, and what notions of agricultural progress do their strategies reveal? Based on extensive fieldwork in lowland Tajikistan, we examine these questions, drawing on political ecology and transition studies scholarship. We consider the state, the market, technology, and crop characteristics and illuminate starkly contrasting seed preferences for maize and cotton. Farmers opt for high-yielding hybrids for the former and relatively low-quality local seed for the latter. In order to explain this apparent inconsistency in seed choices, we address the importance of attending to the context shaping farmers’ seed decisions. These choices reflect pragmatic rather than paradigmatic strategies and challenge presumed dichotomies of distinct development pathways associated with local versus improved seed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Spies et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e1d0165cdc762e9d859317https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-026-10855-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper