PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Performance evaluation of the octopus-type reconfiguration technique to mitigate solar partial shading

RSRamesh Prabhu SrinivasanPDPrince Winston DavidSGSakthivel Ganesan

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of the octopus-type reconfiguration technique for optimizing photovoltaic performance under partial shading.
  • Developed a biomimetic electrical reconfiguration inspired by octopus movement.
  • Tested an 8x8 photovoltaic array under 18 different shading configurations.
  • Compared performance with Total-Cross-Tied, L-Shape, Odd-Even, and Latin Square configurations.
  • Octopus-type reconfiguration outperformed TCT in 11 out of 18 shading scenarios.
  • Achieved a 56% increase in output power and Fill Factor.
  • Significantly reduced mismatch and power losses.

Abstract

Partial shadowing is still a major obstacle to optimizing photovoltaic (PV) performance, even though solar energy makes up 45% of India’s 81GW renewable capacity. In order to maximize current flow without requiring real-time switching hardware, this study suggests a “octopus-type” electrical reconfiguration—a static, biomimetic technique modeled after the coordinated movement of octopus tentacles. This method was created especially for large-scale static installations. It was verified using a 8*8 PV array in 18 different shading patterns and contrasted with configurations like as the Total-Cross-Tied (TCT), L-Shape, Odd-Even, and Latin Square configurations. The findings show that the octopus-type reconfiguration works better than TCT in 11 of the 18 shading scenarios, resulting in a 56% increase in output power and Fill Factor and a considerable reduction in mismatch and power losses. This robust, organic-inspired setup provides an excellent way to improve energy extraction in areas that are prone to shading.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Srinivasan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e31f1a40886becb653e949https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47483-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Static PV array reconfiguration techniques for partial shading mitigation: A critical review2026
  2. 2Partial Shading Effect on Recent PV Array Configurations and Mismatch Loss Mitigation Techniques: An Extensive Review2026
  3. 3Comparative Evaluation of Photovoltaic Array Reconfiguration Techniques2025
  4. 4Quadrant swapping technique for partial shaded solar photovoltaic system2025
  5. 5Static Reconfiguration Method of Photovoltaic Array Based on Improved Competence Square2024 · 3 citations