PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026npj Heritage Science5 citationsOpen Access

Portable XRF for paintings and metals authentication: a critical guide to some practical limitations and multi-technique integrations

MNMarco NicolaLMLuca MatulloAMAlessandro Marello

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness and limitations of portable X-ray fluorescence in art authentication.
  • Literature review of pXRF applications in art authentication.
  • Case studies demonstrating practical uses and challenges of pXRF.
  • Contextual analysis of pXRF results according to instrument specifications and era.
  • Identified strengths of pXRF in non-destructive testing for forgeries.
  • Highlighted common misuse and over-interpretation of pXRF results.
  • Outlined the need for integrating multiple techniques to enhance accuracy.

Abstract

In authentication studies, chemists, scientists, art historians, conservators, and law enforcement collaborate to identify forgeries. For paintings, pigment characterization (detecting anachronistic materials) is decisive. Portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (pXRF) is a dominant, versatile, non-destructive identification method, yet its misuse is documented and widespread. Literature and current results require contextualization by instrument and era, avoiding over-interpretation. This practical review examines pXRF’s strengths and constraints through case studies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nicola et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e3201440886becb653f30fhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-026-02499-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper