The desk-based research and impact assessment were undertaken in accordance with the relevant guidance, the brief issued by the Forestry Commission5 and SWARCH impact assessment methodology6. The site was visited on the 4th of June 2025 by B. Morris, F. Balmond, A. Nock and M. Paine. A walkover survey of the site was undertaken and relevant adjacent heritage assets visited. Photographs of the site, surrounding heritage assets and any potential archaeological features were taken, and images are included in this report. The desk-based research and impact assessment were undertaken in accordance with the relevant guidance, the brief issued by the Forestry Commission5 and SWARCH impact assessment methodology6. The site was visited on the 4th of June 2025 by B. Morris, F. Balmond, A. Nock and M. Paine. A walkover survey of the site was undertaken and relevant adjacent heritage assets visited. Photographs of the site, surrounding heritage assets and any potential archaeological features were taken, and images are included in this report. The desk-based research and impact assessment were undertaken in accordance with the relevant guidance, the brief issued by the Forestry Commission5 and SWARCH impact assessment methodology6. The site was visited on the 4th of June 2025 by B. Morris, F. Balmond, A. Nock and M. Paine. A walkover survey of the site was undertaken and relevant adjacent heritage assets visited. Photographs of the site, surrounding heritage assets and any potential archaeological features were taken, and images are included in this report. See report for Recommendations and Mitigation.
Balmond et al. (2025) studied this question.