PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Watching Brief at Peterhead GI Pits

View Full Paper
KKKaren Kennedy

Key Points

  • To monitor archaeological activity during cable installation between St Fergus and Peterhead Power Stations.
  • Conducted a watching brief over two days in December 2024
  • Monitored excavation activities at TP29 - TP36
  • Collected and analyzed any artefacts found during fieldwork
  • Only one artefact, a natural flint, was recovered
  • The flint was determined to be of no archaeological significance
  • No further archaeological features were encountered, indicating minimal archaeological impact

Abstract

An archaeological Watching Brief was commission by SSEN on TP29 - TP36 in advance of a new cable running from St Fergus Power Station to Peterhead Power Station. Fieldwork was undertaken between 9th and 10th December 2024. The work took place in cold weather with low sun. During the watching brief only one artefact was recovered from the site. On further analysis this was a natural flint and therefore not of archaeological significance. No further archaeological features were encountered, therefore no further work is recommended.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Karen Kennedy (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e320e740886becb6540071https://doi.org/10.5284/1140797
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Watching Brief at Allison Wold Farm, Simon Howe, Sherburn2024
  2. 2Watching Brief at Innerpeffray Library viewing area2026
  3. 3Watching Brief at Birnam Transmission Reduction Station2023
  4. 4Watching Brief at Broadlie Road, Neilston2023
  5. 5Baillie Hill Wind Farm: Watching Brief Basic Report2012