PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Food and Energy Security1 citationsOpen Access

The Power Behind the Plants: Energy Scenarios in Vertical Farming

View Full Paper
TPT. PiovanoVAV. Arcas-PilzGPG. Pennisi

Key Points

  • To assess the environmental performance of a vertical farm in Lombardy, Italy, using life cycle assessment methods.
  • Conducted life cycle assessment (LCA) of a large-scale vertical farm producing lettuce.
  • Evaluated five energy pathways: biomethane CHP, natural gas cogeneration, Italian national grid, renewable electricity, and alternative feedstock biomethane.
  • Assessed environmental impacts across nine categories including climate change and water use.
  • The biomethane CHP scenario resulted in a climate change impact of 3.02 kg CO2-eq per kg of lettuce.
  • Fully renewable electricity supply achieved the lowest impact at 1.38 kg CO2-eq per kg.
  • Electricity consumption for lighting and cooling was the main environmental hotspot across all scenarios.
  • Trade-offs were identified in freshwater eutrophication and terrestrial ecotoxicity related to feedstock handling.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Vertical farms are often promoted as environmentally friendly options; however, evidence on the environmental performance of commercial facilities is limited, particularly within Mediterranean climates. This study reports a cradle‐to‐grave life cycle assessment (LCA) of a large‐scale commercial vertical farm producing lettuce in the Lombardy region of northern Italy. The functional unit was defined as 1 kg of edible lettuce. Environmental impacts were assessed applying the Environmental Footprint (EF) 3.1 characterization method across nine impact categories: climate change, acidification, terrestrial ecotoxicity, freshwater eutrophication, marine eutrophication, land use, water use, and abiotic depletion of fossil and mineral resources. The current operational configuration, based on biomethane‐fueled combined heat and power (CHP) cogeneration, was evaluated against four alternative energy pathways: the Italian national electricity grid, natural gas cogeneration, renewable electricity procurement, and biomethane production from alternative feedstock compositions. The biomethane CHP scenario yielded a climate change impact of 3.02 kg CO 2 ‐eq per kg of edible lettuce, compared to 6.16 kg CO 2 ‐eq per kg under natural gas cogeneration and 6.06 kg CO 2 ‐eq per kg under the Italian grid mix. Minimum climate change impact was obtained under fully renewable electricity supply, at 1.38 kg CO 2 ‐eq per kg. Biomethane performance showed marked sensitivity to feedstock composition, with climate change impacts ranging from 3.02 to 6.44 kg CO 2 ‐eq per kg depending on organic residue and manure proportions. Although biomethane reduced climate change impacts relative to fossil‐based configurations, pronounced trade‐offs were identified in freshwater eutrophication and terrestrial ecotoxicity, attributable to upstream feedstock handling and digestate management. Electricity consumption for lighting, cooling, and dehumidification constituted the dominant environmental hotspot across all scenarios, while infrastructure embodied impacts represented a secondary yet substantial contributor to fossil and mineral resource depletion. Collectively, these results establish energy sourcing as the principal determinant of environmental performance in Mediterranean vertical farming, with all evaluated pathways directly actionable under the European Renewable Energy Directive (RED II, Directive (EU) 2018/2001). Direct electrification with verified low‐carbon electricity delivered the greatest environmental improvements across impact categories. Where biomethane‐based cogeneration is maintained, realizing consistent environmental benefits requires careful feedstock selection, stringent methane‐loss control, and robust digestate management practices. Mitigating infrastructure‐related burdens additionally demands targeted design optimization, responsible material procurement, and appropriate end‐of‐life management strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Piovano et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e3211640886becb65403b4https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.70234
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper