PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Acta Cytologica0 citations

Real-world application of the WHO Reporting System for Lymph Node Cytopathology in the Context of the 5th Edition of the WHO Classification of Hematolymphoid Neoplasms

View Full Paper
AVAna G. Yuil ValdesSHSafina HafeezTLTerrance J. Lynn

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the application of the WHO Reporting System to improve diagnosis of lymph node cytopathology.
  • Reviewed the application of the WHO Reporting System across five diagnostic categories
  • Highlighted cytomorphologic patterns corresponding to WHO-HAEM5 entities
  • Provided guidance for triaging specimens to ancillary testing methods
  • Demonstrated that ancillary studies improve accuracy of cytological diagnoses
  • Reduced the need for repeat procedures through better diagnostic concordance
  • Validated the effectiveness of standardized reporting in clinical practice

Abstract

Background: Cytology is central to the initial work-up of lymphadenopathy in the era of minimally invasive procedures, but some inherent limitations such as loss of tissue architecture require ancillary testing in some cases. Summary: The WHO Reporting System for Lymph Node, Spleen, and Thymus Cytopathology (2024) standardizes category-based reporting and management, while the 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Hematolymphoid Tumors (WHO-HAEM5) defines diagnostic entities and criteria. Key Messages: We review the real-world application of the WHO Reporting System across the five diagnostic categories, highlight cytomorphologic patterns that map to WHO-HAEM5 entities, and provide an overview for triaging material to flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, as well as molecular and genetic testing. We posit that properly selected and validated ancillary studies enable WHO-concordant diagnoses from cytology and reduce repeat procedures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Valdes et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e3213840886becb654057fhttps://doi.org/10.1159/000551968
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper