PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Land0 citationsOpen Access

Cultural Ecosystem Services in the Longji Terraced Fields, China: Spatial Patterns and Supply–Demand Mismatches

View Full Paper
YWYichun WeiJWJinli WuWXWei Xiong

Key Points

  • This study aims to analyze the spatial patterns and supply-demand mismatches of cultural ecosystem services in the Longji Terraced Fields.
  • Developed improved SolVES–IPA framework for assessment.
  • Examined four CES categories: recreational, aesthetic, historical, and educational.
  • Assessed spatial differentiation of CES categories in the Longji Terraced Fields.
  • Recreational and aesthetic values are high in viewing areas; historical and cultural values are found in architectural spaces.
  • Notable supply-demand mismatches exist among CES categories, affecting their optimal use.
  • Proposed strategies for CES optimization include strengthening participatory experiences and improving architectural landscapes.

Abstract

Under the combined pressures of urbanization and tourism development, terraced agricultural heritage sites are increasingly threatened by the degradation of traditional landscapes, the weakening of living cultural practices, and mismatches between the supply and demand of cultural ecosystem services (CESs). As a representative type of Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHSs), the rice terrace landscapes of southern China have formed an integrated system of forests, villages, terraces, and water networks, embodying multiple values related to production, ecology, landscape, and culture. To support the coordination of heritage conservation, tourism development, and the transformation of cultural value, this study takes the core area of the Longji Terraced Fields as a case study and develops an improved SolVES–IPA collaborative assessment framework from the perspective of tourist perception. Four CES categories are examined: recreational value, aesthetic value, historical and cultural value, and educational value. The results show that (1) the four CES categories exhibit significant spatial differentiation. Recreational and aesthetic values are mainly concentrated in high-altitude viewing spaces, whereas historical, cultural, and educational values depend more heavily on traditional architectural spaces and interpretive nodes. (2) Clear supply–demand mismatches exist across CES categories. Recreational value is constrained by limited activity diversity; aesthetic value is limited by inadequate architectural harmony; historical and cultural value is primarily restricted by insufficient continuity of living traditions; and educational value is constrained by incomplete interpretive content and single presentation formats. (3) CES optimization in the Longji Terraced Fields should adopt both type-specific and hierarchical intervention strategies, including priority optimization for high-value units with critical shortcomings, near-term improvement for high-value units with general shortcomings, functional enhancement for medium-value units with critical shortcomings, progressive optimization for medium-value units with general shortcomings, and potential cultivation of low-value units. Based on these findings, this study proposes several optimization directions, including strengthening participatory experiences, promoting the coordinated renewal of the architectural landscape, creating multisensory cultural display spaces, and establishing a multidimensional interpretation network. The improved SolVES–IPA collaborative assessment framework developed in this study integrates CES spatial identification, supply–demand diagnosis, and optimization priority setting, providing a methodological reference and practical support for enhancing cultural services and promoting the coordinated development of heritage conservation and cultural tourism in the Longji Terraced Fields and similar agricultural heritage sites.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wei et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e3215140886becb654083bhttps://doi.org/10.3390/land15040653
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper