Background/Objectives: LINAC-based, single-isocenter, non-coplanar, stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is an effective treatment for patients with multiple brain metastases (BMs). Within such a treatment plan, individual beams can be assigned to treat a subset of the metastases, this is referred to as multi-target beam setup (MTBS). This work evaluates and compares several strategies for MTBS. Methods: A planning study was performed, comparing plan quality parameters for plans resulting from several MTBS strategies, including two automated approaches. Each BM was individually prescribed a dose depending on its volume, resulting in treatment plans with multiple prescription doses. Paddick conformity index and Paddick gradient index were adapted to work with multiple prescription doses. Results: Given the same number of treatment beams, distributing BMs over treatment beams gave statistically significant improvements over targeting the BMs with all beams by 2% CI, 9% GI, 15% V15Gy, and 10% V5Gy. No statistically significant difference was found between different methods to distribute BMs over treatment beams. Increasing the number of treatment beams gave a further statistically significant improvement in plan quality at the cost of increased treatment time. Conclusions: MTBS is an important tool to increase the quality of non-coplanar LINAC-based stereotactic treatment plans for multiple brain metastases with individual dose prescriptions. MTBS can be automated to save planners a significant amount of time. The MTBS algorithm should be restricted in terms of the number of beams it can generate, to limit treatment times.
Staal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: