PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Cancers0 citationsOpen Access

Evaluating Multi-Target Beam Setup Methods for LINAC-Based Stereotactic Treatment of Multiple Brain Metastases with Individual Dose Prescriptions

View Full Paper
XSXander R. StaalJZJaap ZindlerAPA. Petoukhova

Key Points

  • This work aims to evaluate and compare various multi-target beam setup strategies for LINAC-based stereotactic treatment of multiple brain metastases.
  • Conducted a planning study comparing plan quality parameters for several MTBS strategies.
  • Evaluated two automated approaches for multi-target beam setup.
  • Assigned individual dose prescriptions based on the volume of each brain metastasis.
  • Distributing brain metastases over treatment beams improved plan quality by 2% CI, 9% GI, 15% V15Gy, and 10% V5Gy.
  • No significant differences were found among different methods for distributing metastases.
  • Increasing the number of treatment beams further improved plan quality, albeit with longer treatment times.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: LINAC-based, single-isocenter, non-coplanar, stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is an effective treatment for patients with multiple brain metastases (BMs). Within such a treatment plan, individual beams can be assigned to treat a subset of the metastases, this is referred to as multi-target beam setup (MTBS). This work evaluates and compares several strategies for MTBS. Methods: A planning study was performed, comparing plan quality parameters for plans resulting from several MTBS strategies, including two automated approaches. Each BM was individually prescribed a dose depending on its volume, resulting in treatment plans with multiple prescription doses. Paddick conformity index and Paddick gradient index were adapted to work with multiple prescription doses. Results: Given the same number of treatment beams, distributing BMs over treatment beams gave statistically significant improvements over targeting the BMs with all beams by 2% CI, 9% GI, 15% V15Gy, and 10% V5Gy. No statistically significant difference was found between different methods to distribute BMs over treatment beams. Increasing the number of treatment beams gave a further statistically significant improvement in plan quality at the cost of increased treatment time. Conclusions: MTBS is an important tool to increase the quality of non-coplanar LINAC-based stereotactic treatment plans for multiple brain metastases with individual dose prescriptions. MTBS can be automated to save planners a significant amount of time. The MTBS algorithm should be restricted in terms of the number of beams it can generate, to limit treatment times.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Staal et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e3216540886becb65409b0https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18081262
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Treatment for Brain Metastases With Stereotactic Radiation vs Hippocampal-Avoidance Whole Brain Radiation2026 · 30 citations
  2. 2Partitioning of multiple brain metastases improves dose gradients in single‐isocenter radiosurgery2025 · 2 citations
  3. 3Balancing Conformity and Low-Dose Brain Exposure Across Gamma Knife and Linac-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery Techniques for Multiple Brain Metastases2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4A Story of Hypofractionation and the Table on the Wall2021 · 300 citations
  5. 5A simple scoring ratio to index the conformity of radiosurgical treatment plans2000 · 1,049 citations