PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research0 citations

Glottal Area Waveform Measurements for Healthy Female and Male Speakers in Typical, High-Frequency, and Soft Phonation

View Full Paper
RPRita R. PatelZZZhaoyan ZhangMDMichael Döllinger

Key Points

  • The central aim is to investigate vocal fold kinematic differences in typical, high-frequency, and soft-intensity phonation among healthy adults.
  • Measured glottal area waveforms using high-speed videoendoscopy in 66 adults.
  • Analyzed data for phonation across typical, high-frequency, and soft-intensity tasks.
  • Conducted statistical analysis on various glottal cycle characteristics like OQ, SQ, RQ, and others.
  • Female participants showed changes in SQ, RQ, MADRn, and ALR with high frequency and soft intensity.
  • Male participants exhibited changes in OQ, RQ, GGI, TP, MADRn, and ALR under the same conditions.
  • High-frequency phonation relies on increased cricothyroid muscle activity, while soft intensity involves reduced vocal fold adduction.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to examine vocal fold kinematic characteristics associated with typical-frequency and vocal-intensity, high-frequency, and soft-intensity phonation in vocally healthy adults. Method: Glottal area waveform (GAW) was measured from high-speed videoendoscopy in a total of 66 adults (41 women and 25 men) during sustained /i:/ production across the three tasks, resulting in a total of 594 phonations. Statistical analysis of glottal cycle quotients (open quotient OQ, speed quotient SQ, rate quotient RQ, glottal gap index GGI), glottal cycle periodicity (amplitude, time periodicity TP), glottal cycle symmetry (phase asymmetry index, spatial symmetry index, amplitude symmetry index), normalized maximum area declination rate (MADRn), and amplitude-to-length ratio (ALR) was conducted. Principal component analysis was used to identify laryngeal strategies underlying the three tasks. Results: High frequency and soft intensity resulted in changes in SQ, RQ, MADRn, and ALR in female participants, whereas in male participants, they impacted OQ, RQ, GGI, TP, MADRn, and ALR. High-frequency phonation is primarily achieved through increased cricothyroid muscle activity, while soft intensity is primarily achieved by reduced vocal fold adduction and subglottal pressure with compensatory cricothyroid activation. Conclusion: High-frequency and soft-intensity phonations involve distinct laryngeal adjustments and clinically measurable, sex-dependent changes in GAW, highlighting the need to tailor voice therapy to physiological strategies and sex-based differences.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Patel et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e3216540886becb6540a3bhttps://doi.org/10.1044/2026_jslhr-25-00611
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Analysis of Mucosal Wave and Vibratory Patterns in Vocally Healthy Children and Adults2025
  2. 2Humming and electroglottography parameters of phonatory vocal fold contact in young phononormic adults2025
  3. 3The influence of glottal and respiratory factors on aerosol emission during phonation2025
  4. 4Biomechanic characterization of singing with and without vibrato using high-speed videolaryngoscopy and electroglottography2025
  5. 5Dynamic 3D MRI of vocal fold oscillations: <i>In vivo</i> assessment of vocal fold thickness, contact area, and glottal area waveform across phonation types in comparison with high-speed imaging2026