PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Reading Research Quarterly0 citationsOpen Access

Turning Up the Volume on Reading in Middle Childhood: A Systematic Review of Shared Reading Practices With Children Aged 7–11

View Full Paper
FBFaith BerryEVEmma J. VardyHPHannah Phelan

Key Points

  • This review aims to examine shared reading practices with children aged 7 to 11 years and identify effective engagement strategies.
  • Systematic review of thirty-three studies on shared reading practices
  • Synthesis of findings related to instructional strategies and parental roles
  • Analysis of the impact of shared reading on children's outcomes
  • Moderate outcomes associated with structured instructional strategies
  • Parents identified as active participants valuing closeness in shared reading
  • Highlighting the importance of affective dimensions for sustained engagement

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although numerous studies provide extensive evidence of the benefits of shared reading in the home, little is known about how this practice is sustained into middle childhood. The aim of this systematic review is to outline what is currently known about shared reading with children aged 7–11 years old. Thirty‐three studies identified for inclusion in the review were synthesized to explore the nature of shared reading practices in middle childhood; who benefits from partaking and in what ways; and how parents are conceptualized within these interactions. Findings reveal a clear tendency toward instructional, pedagogy‐informed strategies that often produce only moderate outcomes. Nevertheless, parents emerge as active and selective participants who place a high value on the opportunity to build closeness with their child and favor approaches that enable meaningful and enjoyable shared reading interactions. Therefore, from this review, we argue for centering the affective dimensions of shared reading as a core driver of continued engagement, rather than as a peripheral gain, and for closer attention to the behavioral dynamics of facilitative parental support. The review also points to significant gaps in the evidence base, as the limited number and methodological quality of studies in this area emerge as a concern for the field, and practical guidance is offered for strengthening future research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Berry et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e3216540886becb6540a6chttps://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.70114
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper