PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2026Frontiers in Nutrition0 citationsOpen Access

The effect of exogenous ketone bodies on cognition across health and disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper
BBBruno BonnechèreESElizabeth B StephensABAmy C. Boileau

Key Points

  • To quantify the effects of exogenous ketone (EK) supplementation on cognitive performance in humans.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines.
  • Searched databases including PubMed and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials.
  • Performed quality assessment using the PEDro scale and extracted data independently.
  • Calculated standardized mean differences (SMD) using random-effects models.
  • Included 38 studies with 41 protocols and 1,602 participants, 29 protocols eligible for meta-analysis.
  • EK supplementation showed a significant improvement in cognitive performance compared to placebo (SMD = 0.29).
  • No significant differences were found in sub-group analyses related to supplementation type, study duration, or population.

Abstract

Introduction Cognitive function is closely linked to brain energy metabolism and may be compromised by aging, metabolic stress, and neuropsychiatric disease. Ketone bodies can serve as an alternative cerebral fuel and may also exert signaling effects relevant to cognition. Exogenous ketones (EK) offer a practical means of increasing circulating ketone concentrations without dietary carbohydrate restriction. However, the overall effect of EK supplementation on cognitive performance in humans has not been systematically quantified. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched through October 2025 for randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of EK on cognitive outcomes in healthy adults or individuals with neuropsychiatric conditions. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by multiple reviewers using the PEDro scale. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated using random-effects models. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses examined the influence of ketone formulation, intervention duration, dose, population type, and presence of acute cognitive stressors. Results 38 studies comprising 41 protocols (1,602 participants) were included in the systematic review, with 29 protocols (1,117 participants) eligible for meta-analysis. EK supplementation was associated with a statistically significant improvement in cognitive performance compared with placebo (SMD = 0.29, 95% CI 0.16–0.41; p 0.001). Sub-group analyses did not show statistically significant differences between the type of supplementation ( p = 0.083), study duration (acute vs. intermediate; p = 0.11), population type (healthy vs. Alzheimer’s disease; p = 0.077), or the presence of acute cognitive stressors ( p = 0.89). Meta-regression revealed a positive association between daily EK dose and cognitive improvement. Discussion EK supplementation is associated with modest improvements in cognitive performance across diverse populations and study designs. These findings support EK as a flexible nutritional strategy for cognitive support and warrant further investigation in well-powered, long-term trials to clarify optimal dosing, formulation, and clinical applicability. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023471727 , CRD42023471727.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bonnechère et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e470a4010ef96374d8d8f1https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2026.1802531
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper