Decitabine, including its new oral formulation (decitabine-cedazuridine, DEC-C), is commonly used in AML and MDS, particularly in older or unfit patients. While its clinical efficacy and tolerability are well documented, evidence regarding patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) remains limited. We conducted a review of the available literature on PROs in patients with AML and MDS treated with decitabine, with the aim of evaluating its impact on HRQoL, symptom burden, and patient preferences. A systematic literature search of PubMed up to October 2024 identified studies evaluating HRQoL or PROs in adult AML and/or MDS patients receiving decitabine, regardless study design. Ten studies met the inclusion critera. Decitabine-based regimens were associated with preservation of HRQoL compared with intensive chemotherapy and improvements in fatigue and physical functioning versus best supportive care. In patients with AML, baseline HRQoL scores were found to be predictive of survival outcomes. Surveys consistently indicated strong patient preference for oral DEC-C due to reduced treatment burden and greater convenience, though longitudinal data remain limited. In conclusion, currently available HRQoL evidence for decitabine provides meaningful insight to guide further research. Findings from patient surveys and the availability of decitabine in both intravenous and oral formulations emphasize new treatment aspects that can be effectively captured through PROs. Their systematic integration may help uncover critical issues such as symptom burden, adherence, and patient priorities, ultimately fostering more patient-centered care.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Laura Cannella
Adriano Venditti
Raffaele Palmieri
Annals of Hematology
Sapienza University of Rome
University of Rome Tor Vergata
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cannella et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e471ef010ef96374d8e199 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-026-06900-w
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: