PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2026BMC Pulmonary Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Efficacy of single-inhaler triple therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

YZYu ZhangPZPei ZhaoYZYudong Zhang

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of various single-inhaler triple therapies for COPD treatment.
  • Conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs.
  • Included studies comparing single-inhaler triple therapies to dual therapies and free triple therapy.
  • Outcomes assessed included FEV1, exacerbations, and quality of life scores over at least 12 weeks.
  • Fluticasone furoate/vilanterol/umeclidinium showed significant improvement in trough FEV1 compared to dual therapies.
  • BUD/FOR/GLY and free triple therapy also improved total SGRQ scores over dual therapies.
  • Effectiveness and safety across single-inhaler triple therapies appear similar, but further evidence is warranted.

Abstract

This study aims to systematically evaluate which single-inhaler triple therapy (inhaled corticosteroids ICS, long-acting β2-agonists LABA, and long-acting muscarinic antagonists LAMA) is safer and more effective for treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Ovid, Cochrane library and Google Scholar from database establishment to November 2025. Searches were limited to English articles. The RCTs that compared single-inhaler triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA) with triple therapy (ICS/LABA+LAMA) or dual therapy (ICS/LABA or LABA/LAMA) for COPD were included. Minimum duration ≥ 12 weeks and minimum participant numbers ≥ 300 patients. Outcomes included forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), moderate and severe exacerbations, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score and SGRQ responders, transition dyspnea index (TDI) focal score and safety. 12 RCTs (n = 28930 patients) were included in this network meta-analysis. Fluticasone furoate/vilanterol/umeclidinium (FF/VIL/UMEC) was statistically significantly more effective at increasing trough FEV1 (based on change from baseline) than dual therapies (ICS/LABA or LABA/LAMA), free triple therapy (ICS/LABA+LAMA), budesonide/formoterol fumarate/glycopyrronium bromide (BUD/FOR/GLY) and beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate/glycopyrronium bromide (BDP/FOR/GLY). In addition, FF/VIL/UMEC, BUD/FOR/GLY, and free triple therapy (ICS/LABA+LAMA) showed significant improvement in the total SGRQ score to dual therapies (ICS/LABA or LABA/LAMA). FF/VIL/UMEC and free triple therapy (ICS/LABA+LAMA) showed borderline significant improvement in the total SGRQ score to BDP/FOR/GLY. The four available single-inhaler triple therapies and free triple therapy appear to have similar effectiveness and safety. Given the absence of direct comparison studies differences cannot be found with a sufficient level of certainty. Further analysis is needed, as additional evidence becomes available.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e4734c010ef96374d8f1aahttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-026-04298-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper