PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2026Discover Artificial Intelligence0 citationsOpen Access

Cost-sensitive ensemble learning for bankruptcy prediction under extreme class imbalance

TDThanh Tu DamXDXuan Tho Dang

Key Points

  • The aim is to enhance bankruptcy prediction by addressing class imbalance and misclassification costs in decision-making.
  • Developed a cost-sensitive ensemble learning framework for bankruptcy prediction.
  • Utilized decision-centric evaluation metrics to assess model performance.
  • Trained models using repeated, leakage-free cross-validation on a real-world bankruptcy dataset.
  • Integrated calibration measures with cost-aware threshold optimization.
  • Model rankings significantly differ under decision-centric evaluations.
  • Boosting-based ensemble models outperformed others in balancing minority detection and cost efficiency.
  • Data-level resampling techniques like SMOTEENN showed limited advantages with cost-sensitive optimization applied.

Abstract

Abstract Corporate bankruptcy prediction is a high-stakes artificial intelligence (AI) task characterized by extreme class imbalance and asymmetric misclassification costs. Although ensemble learning models have shown strong predictive performance, most existing studies rely on cost-insensitive metrics and fixed decision thresholds, which can misrepresent real-world decision utility. This study reframes bankruptcy prediction as a decision-centric AI problem and proposes a cost-sensitive ensemble learning framework that explicitly decouples probabilistic prediction from decision-making. Ensemble models are trained to produce calibrated risk estimates and are subsequently combined with cost-aware threshold optimization to minimize expected misclassification cost. An extensive evaluation on a real-world bankruptcy dataset using repeated, leakage-free cross-validation integrates imbalance-aware and decision-centric metrics, including PR-AUC, F-score, expected cost, and calibration measures. The results show that model rankings change substantially under decision-centric evaluation. Boosting-based ensembles provide the most favorable balance between minority detection, probability reliability, and decision cost, while data-level resampling via SMOTEENN yields limited benefits once cost-sensitive optimization is applied. Overall, the study highlights the importance of separating prediction from decision-making in imbalanced AI systems and offers practical guidance for deploying ensemble models in high-stakes risk assessment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dam et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e4734c010ef96374d8f1ddhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-026-01266-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper