PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Firm as a Community of Belonging

View Full Paper
CDCarlos Federico Obregon Diaz

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a framework that reconceptualizes firms as communities of belonging, rather than just economic actors driven by contracts.
  • Introduced a four-level analytical structure: individual, relational, institutional, and systemic.
  • Employed game-theoretic analysis to explore equilibria influenced by belonging.
  • Compared findings with major contemporary business theories including shareholder primacy and stakeholder theory.
  • Established that competition with belonging leads to higher performance and sustainability.
  • Identified the role of legitimacy and external belonging as critical for long-term growth.
  • Demonstrated transitions from inferior to superior equilibria through the relational system.

Abstract

This paper develops a theoretical and analytical framework that reconceptualizes the firm as a community of belonging, grounded in the Philosophy of Belonging. It argues that economic organization cannot be fully understood through contracts, incentives, or purely strategic interactions, but must be analyzed as a relational, emotional, and institutional system in which individuals participate as subjects of belonging. The paper introduces a four-level analytical structure—individual, relational, institutional, and systemic—to explain how belonging shapes organizational dynamics. It distinguishes between competition without belonging, which generates destructive internal equilibria, and competition with belonging, which produces cooperative dynamics, higher performance, and organizational sustainability. Using a game-theoretic perspective, the analysis shows how belonging enables transitions from inferior to superior equilibria. The study further examines the firm’s embeddedness in legal, social, and reputational environments, emphasizing that legitimacy and external belonging are essential conditions for long-term growth. A systematic comparison with major contemporary business theories—including shareholder primacy, stakeholder theory, institutional economics, behavioral approaches, and critical management theories—demonstrates that the Philosophy of Belonging provides a unifying framework integrating efficiency, justice, and sustainability. The paper contributes to the emerging literature on organizational theory, institutional economics, and development by proposing belonging as a foundational category for understanding firms and economic systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Carlos Federico Obregon Diaz (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e4734c010ef96374d8f288https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19635476
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper