This paper develops a theoretical and analytical framework that reconceptualizes the firm as a community of belonging, grounded in the Philosophy of Belonging. It argues that economic organization cannot be fully understood through contracts, incentives, or purely strategic interactions, but must be analyzed as a relational, emotional, and institutional system in which individuals participate as subjects of belonging. The paper introduces a four-level analytical structure—individual, relational, institutional, and systemic—to explain how belonging shapes organizational dynamics. It distinguishes between competition without belonging, which generates destructive internal equilibria, and competition with belonging, which produces cooperative dynamics, higher performance, and organizational sustainability. Using a game-theoretic perspective, the analysis shows how belonging enables transitions from inferior to superior equilibria. The study further examines the firm’s embeddedness in legal, social, and reputational environments, emphasizing that legitimacy and external belonging are essential conditions for long-term growth. A systematic comparison with major contemporary business theories—including shareholder primacy, stakeholder theory, institutional economics, behavioral approaches, and critical management theories—demonstrates that the Philosophy of Belonging provides a unifying framework integrating efficiency, justice, and sustainability. The paper contributes to the emerging literature on organizational theory, institutional economics, and development by proposing belonging as a foundational category for understanding firms and economic systems.
Carlos Federico Obregon Diaz (2026) studied this question.