Radial distribution feeders are especially sensitive to reactive-power deficits, which increase technical losses, deteriorate voltage profiles, reduce energy efficiency, and indirectly raise the emissions associated with the energy required to supply those losses. In this context, this paper proposes a sustainability-oriented planning methodology for the location and sizing of capacitor banks in radial distribution feeders, aimed at jointly improving technical performance, economic viability, and sustainability-related energy benefits. The problem is formulated as a discrete multi-objective model and solved through a constructive Greedy heuristic combined with backward/forward sweep load-flow evaluation, considering commercially available capacitor sizes. The methodology is validated on the IEEE 34-bus feeder, a demanding benchmark that remains less frequently used than the IEEE 33- and 69-bus systems in recent capacitor-planning studies. Seven scenarios are analyzed, from the uncompensated base case to configurations with up to six capacitor banks. The results show that all compensated scenarios improve feeder performance, reducing active losses from 25.3327 kW to a minimum of 20.1468 kW, equivalent to a maximum reduction of 20.47%, and increasing the minimum nodal voltage from 0.95528 p.u. to 0.97038 p.u. From a purely financial perspective, the one-bank scenario yields the highest net present value (USD 16,358.86), whereas the two-bank scenario emerges as the most balanced solution within the evaluated set, with annual savings of USD 5432.29 and a net present value of USD 11,497.58. Overall, the results confirm that capacitor-bank planning should be addressed as a trade-off among electrical efficiency, voltage support, profitability, and sustainability-oriented benefits. The proposed framework provides a simple, reproducible, and interpretable planning tool for radial distribution feeders.
Albuja-Calo et al. (2026) studied this question.