PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2026Brain and Behavior0 citationsOpen Access

Efficacy Assessment of Supramarginal Resection Versus Gross Total Resection in Glioblastoma: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta‐Analysis

View Full Paper
DCDipak ChaulagainVSVolodymyr SmolankaASAndriy Smolanka

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the efficacy of supramarginal resection compared to gross total resection in glioblastoma treatment.
  • Conducted a systematic literature review
  • Performed a meta-analysis of existing studies
  • Compared outcomes between supramarginal and gross total resections
  • Supramarginal resection yielded more favorable outcomes compared to gross total resection
  • Minimal difference observed in adverse effects between the two approaches

Abstract

Supramarginal resection of GBM yielded more favorable results than gross total resection, with minimal difference between adverse effects.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chaulagain et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e473de010ef96374d8f949https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.71424
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper