PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 20, 2026Journal of Medical Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Immune Gene Signatures Define Prognosis in Lung Adenocarcinoma

View Full Paper
CLC LiuMCMing‐Tsung ChenSWS C Wang

Key Points

  • The research aims to evaluate the prognostic significance of immune gene expression in lung adenocarcinoma treated with conventional therapy.
  • Analyzed immune gene panel derived from a non-small cell lung cancer dataset.
  • Applied unsupervised hierarchical clustering to identify immune expression subgroups.
  • Evaluated associations of T-cell, B-cell, and NK-cell signatures with clinicopathologic variables.
  • Analyzed survival using Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards models.
  • Identified four distinct immune expression subgroups.
  • High immune gene expression was associated with improved overall survival (OS).
  • Differences in driver mutation patterns were observed between immune-high and immune-low subgroups.
  • Immune subgrouping was linked to pathologic tumor-node-metastasis stage and treatment response.

Abstract

Background: The immune microenvironment influences tumor progression and prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Although immune gene signatures are linked to immunotherapy response, their prognostic value in patients receiving conventional treatment remains unclear. Aim: To evaluate the prognostic significance of immune gene expression in LUAD treated with conventional therapy and to define immune-based molecular subgroups for risk stratification. Methods: An immune gene panel derived from a published non-small cell lung cancer dataset (GSE93157) was analyzed in The Cancer Genome Atlas LUAD cohort ( n = 517). After filtering low-expression genes, 117 immune-related genes were retained. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering identified immune expression subgroups, and T-cell, B-cell, and NK-cell signatures were assessed for associations with clinicopathologic variables and overall survival (OS). Subgroup differences were evaluated using chi-squared tests, and survival was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Four immune expression subgroups were identified. Immune subgrouping was significantly associated with pathologic tumor-node-metastasis stage ( P = 0.0023), driver mutation patterns ( P = 0.0053), smoking status ( P = 0.0394), and treatment response ( P = 0.0005). Immune-high clusters showed heterogeneous driver mutation profiles, including a predominance of EGFR/KRAS/ALK wild-type tumors in subgroup 1, whereas immune-low subgroup 4 displayed a distinct distribution of driver alterations. High immune gene panel expression predicted improved OS (median, 58.8 vs. 39.3 months; hazard ratio HR = 0.57, 95% confidence interval CI = 0.42–0.78; P = 0.0010) and remained independently prognostic after adjustment (HR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.47–0.91; P = 0.0124). T-cell, B-cell, and NK-cell signatures similarly predicted favorable survival. Conclusion: High immune gene expression independently predicts survival in LUAD treated with conventional therapy, reflecting an active immune microenvironment and supporting immune-based risk stratification.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e5c2d003c2939914028ddbhttps://doi.org/10.4103/jmedsci.jmedsci_226_25
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper