This article presents a STEM-based instructional approach for teaching combinatorics to 95 s-year students (72 IT engineering and 23 engineering management students) at a Serbian university of applied sciences. Although students had prior exposure to combinatorics, many relied on memorized formulas without conceptual understanding. To address this issue, we implemented a collaborative, constructivist learning design in which students collaboratively constructed combinatorial formulas through role-play, multiple representations, and real-world problem scenarios rather than receiving them in finalized form. Activities were connected to applications in computer science, reinforcing interdisciplinary relevance. Classroom data were collected through structured field notes, analysis of students’ written solutions, and follow-up interviews when necessary. Qualitative analysis focused on students’ reasoning processes and conceptual development, complemented by statistical comparison of individual test results with a previous cohort taught through traditional lecture-based instruction. The experimental group achieved significantly higher performance. The findings indicate that interdisciplinary, constructivist learning environments can foster deeper conceptual understanding and improved application of combinatorial reasoning. The study contributes to mathematics education literature by illustrating how collaborative knowledge construction in STEM contexts supports the transition from experiential activity to formal symbolic generalization in tertiary combinatorics instruction.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gordana Stankov
Z. Papp
Ibolya Szilágyiné Szinger
Frontiers in Education
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
University of Novi Sad
Technical College of Applied Sciences
University of Dunaújváros
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Stankov et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e7132bcb99343efc98cf01 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1728407
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: