This paper develops a coupled-sector version of the Quantized Dimensional Ledger (QDL) framework. In QDL, physical constructions are represented as integer vectors in a ledger lattice and judged by structural admissibility rather than by dimensional homogeneity alone. Earlier stages of the programme developed admissibility-preserving maps, closure classes, operator exclusions, interaction architecture, and matter representation selection. The present paper asks whether a full physical theory—decomposed into gravitational, gauge, matter, measurement, and interface sectors—can be subjected to one common admissibility law. A global ledger map and admissibility operator are introduced for coupled theories, together with an obstruction-space formulation in the quotient Λ/K/KΛ/K. The main structural result is a coupled-sector compatibility theorem: a coupled theory is globally admissible if and only if the obstruction classes of its constituent sectors sum to zero. This yields a precise interface criterion showing that sector-wise admissibility of the primary sectors is necessary but not sufficient; the interface sector must carry vanishing residual obstruction. Two explicit lattice-level witnesses illustrate the result. In the first, four individually admissible sectors assemble into a globally admissible coupled action. In the second, the same primary sectors are paired with a closure-defective interface and the total action leaves the admissible kernel. The paper does not claim a dynamical unification of the Standard Model and gravity. Its claim is narrower and structural: QDL admits a mathematically explicit compatibility test for coupled representational sectors, providing a pre-dynamical constraint on admissible theory assembly. The paper thereby marks the coupled-sector stage of the broader QDL Unified Admissibility Theory programme.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
James D. Bourassa
Institute of Physics of the Slovak Academy of Sciences
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
James D. Bourassa (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e7143fcb99343efc98db0f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19653194