PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 22, 2026Social Science & Medicine1 citationsOpen Access

Social networks and the theory of planned behavior: How networks matter for healthy eating and meat consumption

View Full Paper
SZStephanie ZintelLSLukas SchumacherAKA Kaiser

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore how social networks influence healthy eating and meat consumption alongside the Theory of Planned Behavior.
  • Survey conducted with 2085 adults in Germany measuring TPB variables and egocentric social network data.
  • Used Bayesian multilevel path analysis to evaluate relationships.
  • Collected data on perceived eating behaviors and attitudes of social network partners.
  • Perceived behavior of social network partners significantly influenced healthy eating and meat consumption.
  • Attitudes and norms of network partners also affected dietary choices but did not directly influence intentions.
  • Social network measures provided additional insight into eating behaviors beyond traditional TPB norms.

Abstract

Objective . Health psychology theories, such as the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), define social norms as the generalized behavioral expectations and observed behavior of important others. Social network measures capture social context more directly, offering an alternative way to examine how others’ attitudes and behaviors enable or constrain action. We integrate both approaches to study the social context of healthy eating and meat consumption. Methods. 2085 German adults completed an online survey (January - March 2024) that measured TPB variables (attitudes, perceived behavioral control, injunctive and descriptive norms, intention, behavior). Egocentric social network data were collected, including the perceived eating behavior and attitudes of network partners toward healthy eating and meat consumption. Bayesian multilevel path analysis was applied. Results. Social network partners’ perceived behavior accounted for variation in healthy eating ( BF 10 = 992 . 5 ) and meat consumption frequency ( BF 10 > 1000 ) beyond TPB norms. Social network partners’ perceived attitudes accounted for variation in meat consumption and healthy eating through their association with attitudes, norms and perceived behavioral control. Neither behavior nor attitudes of social network partners were associated with intentions to eat healthily or intention to reduce meat consumption beyond their association with the TPB’s antecedents of intention. Conclusions. Social network behavior accounts for additional variance in eating behavior beyond TPB norms and may help illuminate the intention behavior gap in healthy eating and meat consumption. Public Significance Statement: This study bridges a traditional psychological theory and social network science to understand healthy eating and meat consumption. We found that peoples real-life social environments, especially the behaviors of the people close to them, are associated with their dietary choices beyond a standard psychological model. Considering social network dynamics may therefore improve strategies for supporting healthy and sustainable eating behaviors. • Considering social aspects in healthy eating and meat consumption. • Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) combined with egocentric social network measures. • Network behavior accounts for variance in eating patterns beyond TPB. • Network variables do not explain variance in intentions beyond TPB.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zintel et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e864866e0dea528dde9448https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119300
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper