PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 22, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Minimally invasive surgery in the correction of recurrent hallux valgus: a case series with 2 year followup

View Full Paper
GFGabriel Ferraz FerreiraGNGustavo Araújo NunesHospital Felício RochoMFMiguel Viana Pereira Filho

Key Points

  • This study assesses the effectiveness of minimally invasive surgical techniques in correcting recurrent hallux valgus deformities.
  • Retrospective analysis of 33 feet that underwent minimally invasive revision surgery.
  • Comparison of two surgical techniques: MICA and META.
  • Assessment through clinical questionnaires, pain scales, and radiographic measurements.
  • Both MICA and META techniques significantly reduced hallux valgus and intermetatarsal angles.
  • All clinical outcome measures showed significant improvement, with patient satisfaction rising.
  • No significant differences were noted between the two surgical techniques regarding outcomes.

Abstract

Introduction: Recurrent deformity following surgical correction remains a complex and technically demanding condition. This studyaimed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in patients undergoing revision procedures for recurrent hallux valgus (HV). Methods: This retrospective case series included 33 feet that underwent minimally invasive revision surgery using either the thirdgeneration minimally invasive Chevron-Akin (MICA) or the fourth-generation Metaphyseal Extra-Articular Transverse and Akin osteotomies (META), following failure of a previous HV correction performed by open or MIS. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and patient satisfaction. Radiographic parameters and complications were recorded and statistically analyzed using R software.Results: Both techniques proved effective in angular correction, with significant reductions in the hallux valgus angle (HVA) andintermetatarsal angle (IMA) (p 0.05). Conclusion: Third- and fourth-generation minimally invasive surgical techniques have proven effective in correcting radiographicparameters and improving pain and functional scores in patients undergoing revision for recurrent hallux valgus, with a low rate ofcomplications

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ferreira et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e864866e0dea528dde957dhttps://doi.org/10.30795/jfootankle.2026.v20.2076
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Minimally invasive surgery in the correction of recurrent hallux valgus: a case series with 2‑year follow‑up2026
  2. 2TWO-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF 334 THIRD-GENERATION MINIMALLY INVASIVE CHEVRON AKIN OSTEOTOMIES (MICA) IN HALLUX VALGUS SURGERY2024
  3. 3Minimally Invasive Surgery for Hallux Valgus: Current Concept Review2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4A comparative study of distal chevron osteotomy and minimally invasive surgery for surgical correction of hallux valgus deformity2026
  5. 5Percutaneous vs Open Surgery for Hallux Valgus Correction: A Meta Analysis2025