PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 22, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

HCV RNA quantification using the Cobas Plasma Separation Card as an alternative to EDTA plasma: a prospective multicenter study

ALAna FUENTES LÓPEZASAriadna Rando SeguraRCRaquel Carracedo

Key Points

  • Evaluate the effectiveness of Cobas Plasma Separation Card for HCV RNA detection compared to EDTA plasma.
  • Conducted a prospective multicenter study with samples collected from individuals with known HCV infection.
  • Used finger prick and venous blood for Cobas PSC sampling and compared results with EDTA plasma.
  • Assessed the clinical sensitivity and specificity for both sample types against a standard threshold.
  • Clinical sensitivity for PSC capillary samples was 100%, with specificity also at 100%.
  • For PSC venous samples, sensitivity was 97.8% and specificity was 100%.
  • HCV viral loads from both Cobas PSC types showed comparable results to EDTA plasma.

Abstract

Abstract Simplified diagnostic approaches are needed to eliminate hepatitis C by 2030. This prospective multicenter study evaluated dried plasma spots collected with the Cobas® Plasma Separation Card (PSC) versus conventional ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) plasma for hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA detection and quantification using Cobas HCV (nucleic acid amplification test). Cobas PSCs were spotted with finger prick-collected capillary (PSC capillary) or venous (PSC venous) blood from individuals with known HCV infection status. HCV infection status was based on anti-HCV antibodies and HCV RNA in EDTA plasma. The threshold for clinical sensitivity/specificity was 1000 IU/mL RNA. Quantitative HCV RNA results were compared between EDTA plasma and Cobas PSC samples. Among 224 subjects, 119 had undetectable and 105 had detectable HCV RNA. Clinical sensitivity and specificity versus EDTA plasma were 100% for PSC capillary, and 97.8% and 100%, respectively, for PSC venous. HCV viral loads from PSC capillary and PSC venous were comparable with EDTA plasma. Cobas PSC combined with Cobas HCV showed good diagnostic accuracy versus EDTA plasma; quantitative HCV RNA results were comparable between the two sample types. Cobas PSC sample collection may obviate the need for venipuncture and help to broaden the reach of HCV testing in remote or under-resourced regions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

LÓPEZ et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e864ec6e0dea528dde9888https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45854-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Acceptability and Feasibility of the Plasma Separation Card for an Integrated Model of Care for HBV and HCV Screening Among People Attending HIV Clinics in Cameroon and Uganda2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Context‐dependent accuracy of the cobas plasma separation card for HCV RNA viral load measurement2024 · 3 citations
  3. 3Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 20212021 · 2,725 citations
  4. 4Understanding Barriers to Hepatitis C Antiviral Treatment in Low–Middle-Income Countries2024 · 13 citations
  5. 5Probable Inference, the Law of Succession, and Statistical Inference1927 · 3,898 citations