PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 22, 2026Journal Of Clinical Periodontology0 citations

The Effect of Orthodontic Tooth Movement on Intrabony Periodontal Defects After Guided Tissue Regeneration—Part I: Human Histologic Evaluation of 20 Consecutive Cases

View Full Paper
PNP x E ter NagySemmelweis UniversityPWPeter WindischSemmelweis UniversityBNBálint NemesSemmelweis University

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effects of orthodontic tooth movement on healing of intrabony periodontal defects treated with guided tissue regeneration techniques.
  • Histologic evaluation of 20 subjects needing regenerative periodontal therapy.
  • Treatment involved either early orthodontic tooth movement or splinting without movement post-surgery.
  • Biopsies analyzed histologically 9 months after treatment.
  • Control group showed better embedment of grafts in newly formed bone compared to test group.
  • Histomorphometry revealed 17.4% new bone in control versus 33.9% in test (p = 0.011).
  • Graft ratio was significantly higher in controls (33.2%) compared to test (16.3%, p = 0.001).

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim To histologically evaluate the healing of intrabony periodontal defects treated with guided tissue regeneration (GTR), if it is combined with orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) or used as a sole treatment. Materials and Methods Twenty subjects requiring regenerative periodontal therapy and OTM were treated with the use of extended, coronally advanced flaps according to the GTR techniques with the utilization of deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) particles. Patients either received early initiation of OTM (test) or had their teeth splinted (control) after the surgical intervention. Re‐entry procedures were scheduled 9 months postoperatively to obtain a biopsy from the previous defect sites. The primary outcome variable comprised histological and histomorphometric analysis. Results Control group cases ( n = 9) revealed nice embedding of graft particles into newly formed bone, which were predominantly present in the central and apical third of the biopsy samples. The coronally located DBBM was more often encapsulated in the connective tissue. Test samples ( n = 10), both at the tension and pressure sites, demonstrated incorporation of a reduced graft ratio into newly formed bone. Ongoing bone formation and the presumably orthodontic‐induced remodeling also interfered with the bone substitute material. Histomorphometry showed a distribution of 17.4% versus 33.9% new bone ( p = 0.011), 33.2% versus 16.3% graft ratio ( p = 0.001) and 49.4% versus 49.7% soft tissue components ( p = 0.74) in the control versus test groups, respectively. Conclusions Early initiation of tooth movement does not appear to adversely affect periodontal bone healing. A pronounced graft reduction and new bone formation in test patients, compared to those in controls, occurred presumably due to the effects of orthodontic‐induced bone remodeling.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nagy et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e865476e0dea528dde9caehttps://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.70134
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper