PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 22, 2026Journal of Fluid Mechanics0 citationsOpen Access

On the wall-normal velocity variance in canonical wall-bounded turbulence

MHMichael HeiselRDRahul DeshpandeGKGabriel G. Katul

Key Points

  • This research aims to analyze the wall-normal velocity variance in turbulent flows across different configurations.
  • Conducted direct numerical simulations across various channel, pipe, and boundary layer flows.
  • Investigated the relationship between wall-normal velocity variance and local shear stress.
  • Applied a semi-empirical fit to Reynolds-number dependence of the variance.
  • Wall-normal velocity variance is significantly influenced by deviations in local stress from surface shear velocity.
  • A semi-empirical fit aligns well with simulation data and literature values, extrapolating to a range of 1.45 to 1.65 times local shear stress.
  • Discrepancies in variances highlight the role of inactive motions, challenging assumptions of the attached eddy hypothesis.

Abstract

The variance and spectra of wall-normal velocities are investigated for direct numerical simulations of turbulent flow in a channel, pipe and zero-pressure-gradient boundary layer across a decade of friction Reynolds numbers. Spectra along the spanwise wavenumber have a pronounced peak well described by the turbulent dissipation rate and the local shear stress throughout the bottom half of the boundary layer. Deviations in the local stress from the surface shear velocity U_ account for almost all of the differences in wall-normal velocity variance observed across different canonical flows, including for plane Couette flow. The dependence on the local stress is attributed to the fact that wall-normal motions are predominately ‘active’ per Townsend’s attached eddy hypothesis and directly contribute to the local shear stress, noting this hypothesis assumes simplified ideal conditions with constant turbulent shear stress. A semi-empirical fit applied to the Reynolds-number dependence of the variance matches the simulations across the lower half of the boundary layer and aligns with observed values in the literature. The fit extrapolates to a value between 1. 45 and 1. 65 times the local shear stress in the high-Reynolds-number limit, consistent with previous predictions relative to U_ including for the vertical velocity in the near-neutral atmospheric boundary layer. However, universality in the exact proportional constant is precluded by small discrepancies in the variances corresponding to dissimilarity in the low-wavenumber contributions across different flow configurations and wall-normal positions. We speculate the dissimilarity is due to relatively weak ‘inactive’ wall-normal motions that are excluded from Townsend’s original hypothesis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Heisel et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e865fd6e0dea528ddea713https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2026.11450
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The “Inactive” Eddy Motion and the Large-Scale Turbulent Pressure Fluctuations in the Dynamic Sublayer1996 · 52 citations
  2. 2Spectrum of Locally Isotropic Turbulence1948 · 131 citations
  3. 3Empirical scaling laws for wall-bounded turbulence deduced from direct numerical simulations2021 · 16 citations
  4. 4Active and inactive contributions to the wall pressure and wall-shear stress in turbulent boundary layers2025 · 11 citations
  5. 5Wall turbulence at high friction Reynolds numbers2022 · 139 citations