Beyond Local Reparability: Structural Compression and the Exhaustion of Incremental Redesign. A Multi-Evidence Synthesis of the 2005 Civil Engineering Curriculum at FACET-UNT

Necesito ver el contenido completo del manuscrito para extraer los elementos precisos. Ya lo tengo en contexto. Aquí la síntesis: Title Beyond Local Reparability: Structural Compression and the Exhaustion of Incremental Redesign. A Multi-Evidence Synthesis of the 2005 Civil Engineering Curriculum at FACET-UNT Description This paper synthesises five empirical studies on the 2005 Civil Engineering curriculum at FACET-UNT to address a question that no single study answers on its own: whether the structural compression identified in graph-theoretic diagnosis is analytically coherent with the repeated limits observed in comparative evaluation and baseline-near intervention. Two diagnostic studies establish that the curriculum is a highly compressed prerequisite architecture. A small upstream gateway set governs most downstream access, the cumulative blockage trajectory saturates early, and structural control is redundant rather than functionally differentiated. Four evaluative studies then show that the same curriculum resists recovery through several plausible intervention families: structurally admissible alternatives contract under institutional translation; the leading comparative architecture does not coincide with the most robust one under uncertainty; local synchronisation relief and prerequisite surgery produce gains of nearly identical and modest magnitude; and neither packaging elasticity nor subject aggregation materially alters the performance regime. Read together, these findings support a cautious but strong conclusion: the inherited curriculum is not merely difficult or administratively rigid, but structurally compressed in a way that restricts the efficacy of incremental repair. The contribution is inferential rather than merely summarising. It shows how independently produced forms of evidence — generated from different analytical objects and different methods — converge systematically to rule out rival explanations and to justify a disciplined distinction between local reparability and meaningful recoverability.