Loperamide and mitragynine were significantly associated with disproportionate reports of ventricular arrhythmia, with PRRs of 3.2 (95% CI: 3.0-3.4) and 8.9 (95% CI: 6.7-11.7), respectively.
Observational
Yes
Are over-the-counter and recreational opioids (loperamide, mitragynine) associated with increased reports of ventricular arrhythmias?
Adverse event reports in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Adverse Event Reporting System (CAERS), and Canada Vigilance Adverse Reaction (CVAR) databases (2015-2021)
Over-the-counter and recreational opioids (loperamide, mitragynine)
Methadone (positive control), buprenorphine, and naltrexone (negative controls)
Ventricular arrhythmia reports (classified according to Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities terminology)safety
Over-the-counter and recreational opioids such as loperamide and mitragynine (kratom) are associated with significant safety signals for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and associated fatalities.
BACKGROUND: Epidemic increases in opioid deaths prompted policies limiting access to prescription opioids in North America. Consequently, the over-the-counter opioids loperamide (Imodium A-D) and mitragynine, the herbal ingredient in kratom, are increasingly used to avert withdrawal or induce euphoria. Arrhythmia events related to these nonscheduled drugs have not been systematically studied. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we sought to explore opioid-associated arrhythmia reporting in North America. METHODS: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Adverse Event Reporting System (CAERS), and Canada Vigilance Adverse Reaction (CVAR) databases were searched (2015-2021). Reports involving nonprescription drugs (loperamide, mitragynine) and diphenoxylate/atropine (Lomotil) were identified. Methadone, a prescription opioid (full agonist), served as a positive control owing to its established arrhythmia risk. Buprenorphine (partial agonist) and naltrexone (pure antagonist), served as negative controls. Reports were classified according to Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities terminology. Significant disproportionate reporting required a proportional reporting ratio (PRR) of ≥2, ≥3 cases, and chi-square ≥4. Primary analysis used FAERS data, whereas CAERS and CVAR data were confirmatory. RESULTS: Methadone was disproportionately associated with ventricular arrhythmia reports (PRR: 6.6; 95% CI: 6.2-7.0; n = 1,163; chi-square = 5,456), including 852 (73%) fatalities. Loperamide was also significantly associated with arrhythmia (PRR: 3.2; 95% CI: 3.0-3.4; n = 1,008; chi-square = 1,537), including 371 (37%) deaths. Mitragynine demonstrated the highest signal (PRR: 8.9; 95% CI: 6.7-11.7; n = 46; chi-square = 315), with 42 (91%) deaths. Buprenorphine, diphenoxylate, and naltrexone were not associated with arrhythmia. Signals were similar in CVAR and CAERS. CONCLUSIONS: The nonprescription drugs loperamide and mitragynine are associated with disproportionate reports of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia in North America.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mori J. Krantz
Todd Rudo
Mark C. Haigney
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
United States Food and Drug Administration
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Krantz et al. (Thu,) conducted a observational in Ventricular arrhythmia. Loperamide and mitragynine vs. Methadone, buprenorphine, and naltrexone was evaluated on Disproportionate reporting of ventricular arrhythmia (PRR 3.2 (loperamide), PRR 8.9 (mitragynine), 95% CI 3.0-3.4 (loperamide), 6.7-11.7 (mitragynine)). Loperamide and mitragynine were significantly associated with disproportionate reports of ventricular arrhythmia, with PRRs of 3.2 (95% CI: 3.0-3.4) and 8.9 (95% CI: 6.7-11.7), respectively.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69e8e6e65169eb7de91c91fe — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.04.009